<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Switing Solution in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switing-solution/m-p/2323299#M344492</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am having multiple vlans in my organisation. My organisations is divides into 4 floor. Each floor is contains the multiple vlans. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to configure the complete redundancy. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please suggest the network topology for the same?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:26:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pramod devhare</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T02:26:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Switing Solution</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switing-solution/m-p/2323299#M344492</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am having multiple vlans in my organisation. My organisations is divides into 4 floor. Each floor is contains the multiple vlans. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to configure the complete redundancy. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please suggest the network topology for the same?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:26:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switing-solution/m-p/2323299#M344492</guid>
      <dc:creator>pramod devhare</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T02:26:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Switing Solution</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switing-solution/m-p/2323300#M344495</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dependig on the size of your network and your requirements,&amp;nbsp; you could have a combined core/distribution layer consisting of 2 switches, and each switch on each floor has 2 links (one link going to each core/distribution switch) that are in an EtherChannel.&amp;nbsp; The core/distribution switches will have 2 links going between them.&amp;nbsp; Also, remember to set the spanning-tree priority on the distribution switch that is to be the root bridge.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 16:11:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switing-solution/m-p/2323300#M344495</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marius Gunnerud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-17T16:11:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Switing Solution</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switing-solution/m-p/2323301#M344499</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are many correct answers for the limited information you provided. Marius' suggestion is one. The general layout of access layer (local switches on each floor) and collapsed core/distribution switch is pretty typical and a good recommendation for this size of network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For more details, can you tell us:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- number of users per floor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- whether 1 Gbps (or multiple 1 Gbps ) or 10 Gbps is desired leaving the local switch(es)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- whether you have fiber between floors and is it 10 Gbps-capable (OM3 or better specification)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switing-solution/m-p/2323301#M344499</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-17T17:11:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Switing Solution</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switing-solution/m-p/2323302#M344502</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear Sir,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply. I am sharing the network details in my organisation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) we are having four floor plus&amp;nbsp; ground floor. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Forth floor:- 88 users&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Third floor:- 59 users&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; second floor:- 52 users&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; first floor: 70 users&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Ground floor 42 users&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Every floor there are 10 numbers of IP Phones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Each floor is contains Number of VLANS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4) The Fiber conection is available from every floor to Core switch and each swich is having 10 GBps SFP+ module.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this information is sufficient?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 08:43:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switing-solution/m-p/2323302#M344502</guid>
      <dc:creator>pramod devhare</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-19T08:43:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Switing Solution</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switing-solution/m-p/2323303#M344503</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That gets us closer. So each floor (except ground) has &amp;gt;48 users = the number we can support from a 1RU switch. So we would typically put a 2-switch stack. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For this size of network, Cisco 2960X would be a good choice. They can do PoE at various levels - see &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps12995/data_sheet_c78-728232.html"&gt;table 6 of the product data sheet&lt;/A&gt; for options. Each switch can have dual power supplies of desired and your links to the core switch can be from separate stack members. You could use 2 x 24-port model for the ground floor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your core would need to handle 10 x 10 Gbps links. That's going to require a bigger switch - we typically see mid-sized campus's using the 4500X for this function. For redundancy you would put a pair of 4500X in a VSS cluster. That way they logically act as one switch and all of your floor switch uplinks can be bound into a 20 Gbps Etherchannel giving maximum bandwidth and resiliency. The 4500X data sheet is &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps10902/ps12332/data_sheet_c78-696791.html"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;. You would need the entry level model, WS-C4500X-16SFP+.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:16:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switing-solution/m-p/2323303#M344503</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-19T14:16:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

