<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA failover pair software upgrade question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-pair-software-upgrade-question/m-p/2328811#M345551</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have been upgrading failover pairs for quite some time now with no problems, knock on wood.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have never had a problem, just wondering if I go by the book and load the new code on both&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;boxes, change the boot statement, go to the primary box and enter the "failover reload-standby" command &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and then the "no failover active" statement to make the standby active. If data is not passing on the upgraded box, can I just failover &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"no falover active" back to the original box without any issues ?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cmazur</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T02:19:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA failover pair software upgrade question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-pair-software-upgrade-question/m-p/2328811#M345551</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have been upgrading failover pairs for quite some time now with no problems, knock on wood.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have never had a problem, just wondering if I go by the book and load the new code on both&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;boxes, change the boot statement, go to the primary box and enter the "failover reload-standby" command &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and then the "no failover active" statement to make the standby active. If data is not passing on the upgraded box, can I just failover &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"no falover active" back to the original box without any issues ?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-pair-software-upgrade-question/m-p/2328811#M345551</guid>
      <dc:creator>cmazur</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T02:19:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASA failover pair software upgrade question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-pair-software-upgrade-question/m-p/2328812#M345558</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The most common issues are going from 7.x to 8.x (syntax changes) and pre-8.3 to post-8.3 (more memory required, big NAT change and others) - all of which are covered in release notes, upgrade guides, documents here etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Otherwise that procedure is pretty much the same up through the latest ASA software version (9.1(2) as of right now).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course if you have multiple contexts or a cluster, some other caveats apply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:59:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-pair-software-upgrade-question/m-p/2328812#M345558</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-30T18:59:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

