<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Upgrading ASAs in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrading-asas/m-p/2256778#M346132</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a pair of ASA5520 firewalls running 8.4(2).&amp;nbsp; We want to upgrade them because we're having problems with SSL VPNs (see link below).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/thread/2148408" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2148408&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a reason why we should stop at 8.4(3.8) and not go to one of the 9.x releases?&amp;nbsp; If not, please can you recommend a stable 9.x version?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, they're in a &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;clustered pair.&amp;nbsp; Do you envisage any loss of connectivity when upgrading them (if we do them one at a time)?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:14:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Sykes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T02:14:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Upgrading ASAs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrading-asas/m-p/2256778#M346132</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a pair of ASA5520 firewalls running 8.4(2).&amp;nbsp; We want to upgrade them because we're having problems with SSL VPNs (see link below).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/thread/2148408" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2148408&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a reason why we should stop at 8.4(3.8) and not go to one of the 9.x releases?&amp;nbsp; If not, please can you recommend a stable 9.x version?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, they're in a &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;clustered pair.&amp;nbsp; Do you envisage any loss of connectivity when upgrading them (if we do them one at a time)?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:14:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrading-asas/m-p/2256778#M346132</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex Sykes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T02:14:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Upgrading ASAs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrading-asas/m-p/2256779#M346133</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;9.0(2) seems to be the most stable current code. It has the greatest number of bug fixes. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There's no need to go to a version between your current release and that one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your HA pair is Active/Standby, a zero downtime upgrade is the supported path.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:44:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/upgrading-asas/m-p/2256779#M346133</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-19T13:44:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

