<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA 8.2 multiple nat statements? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-8-2-multiple-nat-statements/m-p/2276239#M348129</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jouni, you're really picking my questions and answering them one by one. You provide good short explanation, I now see the connection between the nat (int) VALUE and global (int) VALUE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:58:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>3moloz123</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-13T09:58:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA 8.2 multiple nat statements?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-8-2-multiple-nat-statements/m-p/2276237#M348125</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to config "when host X on vlanX goes to a network that is across an ipsec tunnel, for which vlanX network is not in the encryption domains, translate host X address to that of the asa in a network that is part of the crypto domain".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interface vlan544 (172.16.80.0/24) is the local encryption domain, and 10.1.0.0/29 holds some monitoring servers that should not be part of the encryption domain, but rather get it's source address translated to that of the firewall in 172.16.80.0/24. Here's how I did:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# Vlan522 for 10.1.0.0/29, need to somehow have a specific nat here I guess that falls between the no nat and the generic "nat the rest to the global)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (vlan522) 0 access-list vlan522_nat0_outbound&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (vlan522) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# Next, I defined an ACL to match the source network (10.1.0.0/29) with the remote encryption domain (172.18.0.0/24):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list prtg-to-slott-net extended permit ip 10.1.0.0 255.255.255.248 172.18.0.0 255.255.255.0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# Removing the global nat on vlan522:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no nat (vlan522) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# Set up the newly defined access-list as nat entry 1 instead&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (vlan522) 1 access-list &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;prtg-to-slott-net &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# Re-adding the catch all nat but this time as rule number #2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (vlan522) 2 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This obviously didn't work, the second (number 2) rule is never hit. What am I doing wrong?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:57:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-8-2-multiple-nat-statements/m-p/2276237#M348125</guid>
      <dc:creator>3moloz123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T01:57:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASA 8.2 multiple nat statements?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-8-2-multiple-nat-statements/m-p/2276238#M348126</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I got a bit confused reading that &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/4.5.4/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So did I understand correctly that the situation is the following&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;You have existing L2L VPN connection configured between 1 local network and 1 remote network&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;You would want to configure a second local network to be able to use the L2L VPN connection without changing the L2L VPN configurations?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case you should probably do the following&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Determine a free IP address that is not used in the original local network that is part of the L2L VPN currently&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Configure a Dynamic Policy PAT for it&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;access-list L2LVPN-POLICYPAT permit ip 10.1.0.0 255.255.255.248 172.18.0.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;global (outside) 100 172.16.80.254&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;nat (vlan522) 100 access-list L2LVPN-POLICYPAT&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is ofcourse a chance that some existing NAT configuration makes this one useless but for that we have "packet-tracer" command to determine which configurations are hit when the traffic arrives to the ASA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;packet-tracer intput vlan522 tcp 10.1.0.2 12345 172.18.0.100 3389&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The port and IP address values I used are random and can be pretty much anything. Ofcourse the mentioned traffic needs to be allowed in the interface ACL or the "packet-tracer" hits and ACCESS-LIST DROP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jouni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:48:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-8-2-multiple-nat-statements/m-p/2276238#M348126</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jouni Forss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-13T09:48:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASA 8.2 multiple nat statements?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-8-2-multiple-nat-statements/m-p/2276239#M348129</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jouni, you're really picking my questions and answering them one by one. You provide good short explanation, I now see the connection between the nat (int) VALUE and global (int) VALUE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:58:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-8-2-multiple-nat-statements/m-p/2276239#M348129</guid>
      <dc:creator>3moloz123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-13T09:58:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

