<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Rv042 firewall access rule in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rv042-firewall-access-rule/m-p/2206919#M348668</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It should be working then&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you share&amp;nbsp; a screenshot so we can correlate it,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 14:20:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-06T14:20:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Rv042 firewall access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rv042-firewall-access-rule/m-p/2206914#M348663</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a server behind an rv042 that i would like to block access to on one port from outside in.&amp;nbsp; I have configured the rule as follows:&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;priority = 1.&amp;nbsp; policy name&amp;lt;name&amp;gt;.&amp;nbsp; enable&amp;lt;checked&amp;gt;.&amp;nbsp; action = deny.&amp;nbsp; service &amp;lt;service to block&amp;gt;. source interface = wan1.&amp;nbsp; sources = any.&amp;nbsp; destination = &amp;lt;public ip address of server&amp;gt;.&amp;nbsp; day &amp;lt;nothing&amp;gt;.&amp;nbsp; This does not block the intended port from outside.&amp;nbsp; I also changed the destination to be the private ip address and i changed the source interface to lan and to *.&amp;nbsp; What is the correct syntax to do this?.&amp;nbsp; Port forwarding is enabled.&amp;nbsp; I noticed that there is one enty in the forwarding table for the public ip but it is going to a dead private ip address.&amp;nbsp; Would this have an effect?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:53:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rv042-firewall-access-rule/m-p/2206914#M348663</guid>
      <dc:creator>mialbert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T01:53:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rv042 firewall access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rv042-firewall-access-rule/m-p/2206915#M348664</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Mialbert,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have a port-forwarding for the service we are dealing with?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 22:46:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rv042-firewall-access-rule/m-p/2206915#M348664</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-04T22:46:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rv042 firewall access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rv042-firewall-access-rule/m-p/2206916#M348665</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No there is not.&amp;nbsp; All i want to do is block a tcp port.&amp;nbsp; Would i need to have a port forwarding rule for that tcp port in order to block it.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 02:20:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rv042-firewall-access-rule/m-p/2206916#M348665</guid>
      <dc:creator>mialbert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-05T02:20:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rv042 firewall access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rv042-firewall-access-rule/m-p/2206917#M348666</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not necesarilly,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This GUI configuration should be done as you have it already, are you sure the ACL rule is on the top of the rules (number 1 place) so it take precedence?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julio &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 03:56:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rv042-firewall-access-rule/m-p/2206917#M348666</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-05T03:56:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rv042 firewall access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rv042-firewall-access-rule/m-p/2206918#M348667</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes it is, it is first in order.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 00:31:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rv042-firewall-access-rule/m-p/2206918#M348667</guid>
      <dc:creator>mialbert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-06T00:31:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rv042 firewall access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rv042-firewall-access-rule/m-p/2206919#M348668</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It should be working then&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you share&amp;nbsp; a screenshot so we can correlate it,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 14:20:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rv042-firewall-access-rule/m-p/2206919#M348668</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-06T14:20:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

