<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA  Active/Standby scenario in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-standby-scenario/m-p/2224261#M357758</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mahesh,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have physical ASAs ASA1 and ASA2 configured for Active/Standby.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASA1 is Active at start and ASA2 is the Standby.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you make ASA2 the Active and then reload it then ASA1 will become the Active and after ASA2 has rebooted it will move to Standby state.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I dont know why you would want to first move an ASA to Active and then reload it. Usually its the Standby device that gets booted. Perhaps because of software upgrades or some other scenario.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But yes, the ASA Failover should behave in the above mentioned way if you were to do what you were suggesting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jouni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 20:57:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jouni Forss</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-04T20:57:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA  Active/Standby scenario</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-standby-scenario/m-p/2224260#M357757</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Say we have two ASA&amp;nbsp; config in active and standby.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hostname is ASA and say ASA1 is active and ASA2 is standby.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IF we make ASA2 as active and reload it then ASA2 should become standby as we have already active ASA1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Need to confirm&amp;nbsp; if i am correct in this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MAhesh &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:38:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-standby-scenario/m-p/2224260#M357757</guid>
      <dc:creator>mahesh18</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T01:38:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASA  Active/Standby scenario</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-standby-scenario/m-p/2224261#M357758</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mahesh,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have physical ASAs ASA1 and ASA2 configured for Active/Standby.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASA1 is Active at start and ASA2 is the Standby.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you make ASA2 the Active and then reload it then ASA1 will become the Active and after ASA2 has rebooted it will move to Standby state.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I dont know why you would want to first move an ASA to Active and then reload it. Usually its the Standby device that gets booted. Perhaps because of software upgrades or some other scenario.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But yes, the ASA Failover should behave in the above mentioned way if you were to do what you were suggesting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jouni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 20:57:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-standby-scenario/m-p/2224261#M357758</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jouni Forss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-04T20:57:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASA  Active/Standby scenario</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-standby-scenario/m-p/2224262#M357759</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi jouni,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for confirming my thoughts as i am not going to do any&amp;nbsp; switchover --&amp;nbsp; i am&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; just trying&amp;nbsp; to learn the active/standby failover concept from every angle.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mahesh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 21:09:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-standby-scenario/m-p/2224262#M357759</guid>
      <dc:creator>mahesh18</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-04T21:09:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

