<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA EIGRP question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-eigrp-question/m-p/2168249#M358581</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Josh,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (IGRP) always prefers longest match from advertised routes and the shorter match routes will become standby.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Easiest way to load-balance to two remote routers is to advertise both 4 /24s to remote routers under EIGRP processor however summarize one set of 4 /24s to a remote router(A) that you want to be in standby, so that the second remote router(B) will become a primary path for that particular 4 /24s. Likewise do that same for other 4 /24s on remote router(B) so that router(A) become primary for your other set of 4 /24s.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rizwan Rafeek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:58:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rizwanr74</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-10T00:58:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA EIGRP question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-eigrp-question/m-p/2168247#M358574</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is a good method for injecting routes into EIGRP on the outside of the ASA to advertise to my edge routers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The senerio is I have two edge routers running bgp to diverse providers.&amp;nbsp; These edge routers will be peering EIGRP with an ASA A/S cluster and advertising a default route to them.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; My network is a /21 of public space.&amp;nbsp; In order to load share inbound I want to annouce 4 /24s of my /21 to one provider and the other 4 /24s to my other provider.&amp;nbsp; The subnet between the ASAs and the edge is a /25.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; So what I would like to do is set this up so the ASAs can inject the /24s into EIGRP.&amp;nbsp; So then I can use the subnets not in the /25 for NAT.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I read some documents about using null0 routes on the ASA but in 9.0 that might have problems with the "route lookup" keyword.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this do-able in a good design?&amp;nbsp; Or should I just use statics....&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:26:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-eigrp-question/m-p/2168247#M358574</guid>
      <dc:creator>Josh Sprang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T01:26:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASA EIGRP question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-eigrp-question/m-p/2168248#M358579</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Josh,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For Flexibility purposes I would use EIGRP,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now we got to remember that the ASA was not built as a dedicated routing appliance so it will not behave as good as we would like ( Routing speaking ) so we are going to be sort of limited with the things we can accomplish.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would recommend you to use a redistribute-list ( with the only option being an ACL) so you can send the information to the right neigbhors,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:50:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-eigrp-question/m-p/2168248#M358579</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-10T00:50:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASA EIGRP question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-eigrp-question/m-p/2168249#M358581</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Josh,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (IGRP) always prefers longest match from advertised routes and the shorter match routes will become standby.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Easiest way to load-balance to two remote routers is to advertise both 4 /24s to remote routers under EIGRP processor however summarize one set of 4 /24s to a remote router(A) that you want to be in standby, so that the second remote router(B) will become a primary path for that particular 4 /24s. Likewise do that same for other 4 /24s on remote router(B) so that router(A) become primary for your other set of 4 /24s.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rizwan Rafeek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:58:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-eigrp-question/m-p/2168249#M358581</guid>
      <dc:creator>rizwanr74</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-10T00:58:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

