<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: identical policy but with a different Lifetime in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identical-policy-but-with-a-different-lifetime/m-p/2194158#M358943</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only reason its configured was to show to you that even that is possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just configured on my ASA before I answered. In a real situation ofcourse I wouldnt need to have 2 identical policys. The highest policy number would never be applied/matched in a VPN negotiation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They are gone in through from the lowest to the highest value during VPN negotiations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jouni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:21:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jouni Forss</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-04T16:21:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>identical policy but with a different Lifetime</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identical-policy-but-with-a-different-lifetime/m-p/2194153#M358932</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm wondering if it's possible to create an identical policy (3 &amp;amp;4) but with different Lifetime? see below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;isakmp policy 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;authen pre-share&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;encrypt Aes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hash sha&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;group 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;lifetime 246&lt;STRONG&gt;00&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;isakmp policy 4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;authen pre-share&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;encrypt Aes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hash sha&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;group 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;lifetime 266&lt;STRONG&gt;00&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:23:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identical-policy-but-with-a-different-lifetime/m-p/2194153#M358932</guid>
      <dc:creator>smetieh001</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T01:23:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: identical policy but with a different Lifetime</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identical-policy-but-with-a-different-lifetime/m-p/2194154#M358934</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I dont see a reason why you couldnt do this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example from my own ASA (just to show that its possible)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Policy 10 and 11 are identical in other ways other than lifetime&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Policy 10 and 20 are actually identical in every way other than the priority (10 and 20)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto ikev1 policy 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; authentication pre-share&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; encryption aes-256&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; hash sha&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; group 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; lifetime 28800&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto ikev1 policy 11&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; authentication pre-share&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; encryption aes-256&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; hash sha&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; group 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; lifetime 28810&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto ikev1 policy 20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; authentication pre-share&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; encryption aes-256&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; hash sha&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; group 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; lifetime 28800&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The configuration format is slightly different than the above as I am using newer software.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jouni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:07:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identical-policy-but-with-a-different-lifetime/m-p/2194154#M358934</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jouni Forss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-04T16:07:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>identical policy but with a different Lifetime</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identical-policy-but-with-a-different-lifetime/m-p/2194155#M358935</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thanks Jouni. thought so too just wanted to be sure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:14:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identical-policy-but-with-a-different-lifetime/m-p/2194155#M358935</guid>
      <dc:creator>smetieh001</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-04T16:14:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>identical policy but with a different Lifetime</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identical-policy-but-with-a-different-lifetime/m-p/2194156#M358938</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Jouni,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any reason why you have identical phase 1 policy? just curious...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:19:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identical-policy-but-with-a-different-lifetime/m-p/2194156#M358938</guid>
      <dc:creator>smetieh001</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-04T16:19:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>identical policy but with a different Lifetime</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identical-policy-but-with-a-different-lifetime/m-p/2194157#M358941</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No problem,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please mark the question as answered if it did &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/4.5.4/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jouni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:20:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identical-policy-but-with-a-different-lifetime/m-p/2194157#M358941</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jouni Forss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-04T16:20:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: identical policy but with a different Lifetime</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identical-policy-but-with-a-different-lifetime/m-p/2194158#M358943</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only reason its configured was to show to you that even that is possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just configured on my ASA before I answered. In a real situation ofcourse I wouldnt need to have 2 identical policys. The highest policy number would never be applied/matched in a VPN negotiation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They are gone in through from the lowest to the highest value during VPN negotiations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jouni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:21:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identical-policy-but-with-a-different-lifetime/m-p/2194158#M358943</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jouni Forss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-04T16:21:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>identical policy but with a different Lifetime</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identical-policy-but-with-a-different-lifetime/m-p/2194159#M358944</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; yeah.. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:29:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/identical-policy-but-with-a-different-lifetime/m-p/2194159#M358944</guid>
      <dc:creator>smetieh001</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-04T16:29:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

