<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic two public natted to single private in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-public-natted-to-single-private/m-p/2158405#M361114</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As long as this is for inbound traffic only, I'm assuming this will not cause problems?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Two different public ips on the outside interface (doesn't include the interface ip) static natted to a single dmz host.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:07:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lcaruso</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T01:07:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>two public natted to single private</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-public-natted-to-single-private/m-p/2158405#M361114</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As long as this is for inbound traffic only, I'm assuming this will not cause problems?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Two different public ips on the outside interface (doesn't include the interface ip) static natted to a single dmz host.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:07:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-public-natted-to-single-private/m-p/2158405#M361114</guid>
      <dc:creator>lcaruso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T01:07:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>two public natted to single private</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-public-natted-to-single-private/m-p/2158406#M361116</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You mean that you want 2 public IP addresses for a single DMZ host IP address?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is theres a specific reason for this kind of setup and what is it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess you can configure this but for it to actually have any possibility to work you have to somehow specify when each public IP address is used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you first clarify the reasoning for looking for this kind of NAT setup and then we could look into the actual configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also mention your device software version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jouni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:39:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-public-natted-to-single-private/m-p/2158406#M361116</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jouni Forss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-28T20:39:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>two public natted to single private</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-public-natted-to-single-private/m-p/2158407#M361118</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply. IOS is 8.3(2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The webmaster specified that setup. Domain names resolve to the seperate outside address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;name1.domain.com = &amp;gt; public ip 1 =&amp;gt; dmz host foo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;name2.domain.com =&amp;gt; public ip 2 =&amp;gt; dmz host foo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dmz host foo uses http headers to determine which website traffic is sent to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My understanding was as long as the traffic is initiated inbound, this would work okay.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:44:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-public-natted-to-single-private/m-p/2158407#M361118</guid>
      <dc:creator>lcaruso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-28T20:44:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: two public natted to single private</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-public-natted-to-single-private/m-p/2158408#M361119</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think it should work in the way you describe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If connections are opened from the "outside" there should be no problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the other hand if the server opens the connections at some point, it will only be using only one of the Static NAT configurations when connecting "outside". And the the Static NAT used for outbound connections would be chosen according to how the ASA handles NAT order of operations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jouni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:51:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-public-natted-to-single-private/m-p/2158408#M361119</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jouni Forss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-28T20:51:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>two public natted to single private</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-public-natted-to-single-private/m-p/2158409#M361121</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seems to be working in testing as you describe. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 21:03:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-public-natted-to-single-private/m-p/2158409#M361121</guid>
      <dc:creator>lcaruso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-28T21:03:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

