<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA max concurrent connections in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-max-concurrent-connections/m-p/2157635#M361115</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I imagine it does.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also I guess if we are talking about just some random UDP traffic it would also mean that the default timeout for a connection would be 2min. The most usual UDP traffic would probably be DNS querys. In those cases I presume though that the UDP connections dont stay on firewall for long as long as the firewall sees the DNS reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But as I said if we are talking about some random UDP traffic that is allowed through the firewall I would guess it stays in the connection table of the firewall for a couple of minutes. So you might be looking at 1000 concurrent connections or even more?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have once witnessed a single server sending so much UDP traffic that it reached the connection limit of an ASA5540 which is 400 000 concurrent connections.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jouni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:24:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jouni Forss</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-28T20:24:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA max concurrent connections</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-max-concurrent-connections/m-p/2157634#M361113</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If I have a thousand nodes from the public each perform a UDP ping to a server behind the ASA, does each count as a concurrent connection?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-max-concurrent-connections/m-p/2157634#M361113</guid>
      <dc:creator>DannyHuston</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T01:07:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASA max concurrent connections</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-max-concurrent-connections/m-p/2157635#M361115</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I imagine it does.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also I guess if we are talking about just some random UDP traffic it would also mean that the default timeout for a connection would be 2min. The most usual UDP traffic would probably be DNS querys. In those cases I presume though that the UDP connections dont stay on firewall for long as long as the firewall sees the DNS reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But as I said if we are talking about some random UDP traffic that is allowed through the firewall I would guess it stays in the connection table of the firewall for a couple of minutes. So you might be looking at 1000 concurrent connections or even more?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have once witnessed a single server sending so much UDP traffic that it reached the connection limit of an ASA5540 which is 400 000 concurrent connections.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jouni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:24:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-max-concurrent-connections/m-p/2157635#M361115</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jouni Forss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-28T20:24:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASA max concurrent connections</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-max-concurrent-connections/m-p/2157636#M361117</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's correct. A UDP ping would consume a connection assuming your access-list permits that.&amp;nbsp; Interestingly I'm dealing with developers who are working on a public service that does periodic UDP pings to our data center as a heartbeat and they wanted to know if we could sustain that.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 21:09:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-max-concurrent-connections/m-p/2157636#M361117</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jack Leung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-28T21:09:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

