<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cascading (Shared Interface - Trafic) in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cascading-shared-interface-trafic/m-p/2075255#M392194</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hi Michal,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:36:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rodri_bras</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-28T11:36:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cascading (Shared Interface - Trafic)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cascading-shared-interface-trafic/m-p/2075251#M392190</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I like to know with cascading in the ASA about contexts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two contexts, one contextA e one contextB, i'm using a front wit other. ContextA have two interfaces logic, one inside and onde cascading. Context B have two interfaces logic, one inside and one cascading. The cascading interface are facing one another, but only use a physical interface Gi0/1. &lt;BR /&gt;The cascading interface is a logical interface that does not pass through the switch only barraento the wing, however need to set a physical interface for the same work. example the physical interface gi0 / 1, and the interface would be cascading gi0/1.100.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My doubt is regarding this cascading interface (shared), my whole scenario using 10G, and I put in cascading 1G, I will have problems?&lt;IMG src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/legacy/8/4/5/126548-Desenho1.gif" alt="Desenho1.gif" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" onclick="" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:52:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cascading-shared-interface-trafic/m-p/2075251#M392190</guid>
      <dc:creator>rodri_bras</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T00:52:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cascading (Shared Interface - Trafic)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cascading-shared-interface-trafic/m-p/2075252#M392191</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Rodri,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes - that will work. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you share the same interface (gig0/1.20) on both contexts just make sure it uses different mac address in each context ("mac-address auto" command) and also it has different IP address configured (unless you want to rely on NAT rules for determining which packet should go to which context).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You also need to make sure that inteface is UP (connected to switch). That switch will see both mac-adresses on that port. Both contexts will reply with correct ARP reply for it's IP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:49:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cascading-shared-interface-trafic/m-p/2075252#M392191</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michal Garcarz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-25T15:49:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cascading (Shared Interface - Trafic)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cascading-shared-interface-trafic/m-p/2075253#M392192</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;Hello&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;Marchal&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;yes&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;I know how to&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;make it work&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;, however&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;this&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;is&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;not&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;the issue&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;my issue&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;is whether this&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;shared&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;interface&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;that&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;is&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;a virtual interface&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;within the box&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;if it&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;uses the&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;bandwith&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;cable&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;or&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;using&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;the&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;internal bus&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;of the&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;firewall&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;because all&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;this&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;on&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;10g&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;connection&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;and&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;this interface&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;between the contexts&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;in&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;this&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;1g&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;this can&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;influence the&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;transmission of&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;packets&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="hps"&gt;between contexts&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cascading-shared-interface-trafic/m-p/2075253#M392192</guid>
      <dc:creator>rodri_bras</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-27T18:16:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cascading (Shared Interface - Trafic)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cascading-shared-interface-trafic/m-p/2075254#M392193</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It will use physical interface, you might have a problems - because of bottleneck. I&amp;nbsp; would advise to use 10g interface for that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:55:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cascading-shared-interface-trafic/m-p/2075254#M392193</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michal Garcarz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-27T18:55:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cascading (Shared Interface - Trafic)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cascading-shared-interface-trafic/m-p/2075255#M392194</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hi Michal,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:36:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cascading-shared-interface-trafic/m-p/2075255#M392194</guid>
      <dc:creator>rodri_bras</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-28T11:36:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

