<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FPM and Layer 2 Broadcasts in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fpm-and-layer-2-broadcasts/m-p/2134920#M395275</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello. Can FPM (Flexible Packet Matching) match Layer 2 broadcasts, based on Ethertype and first few bytes of payload? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:26:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sasha</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T00:26:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FPM and Layer 2 Broadcasts</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fpm-and-layer-2-broadcasts/m-p/2134920#M395275</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello. Can FPM (Flexible Packet Matching) match Layer 2 broadcasts, based on Ethertype and first few bytes of payload? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:26:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fpm-and-layer-2-broadcasts/m-p/2134920#M395275</guid>
      <dc:creator>sasha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T00:26:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FPM and Layer 2 Broadcasts</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fpm-and-layer-2-broadcasts/m-p/2134921#M395276</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've found the answer in FPM Q and A on &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6723/prod_qas0900aecd804b915e.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6723/prod_qas0900aecd804b915e.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: bold; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 18pt; margin-right: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-decoration: none; text-indent: -18pt; text-transform: none;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;gt; Q.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; Can Flexible Packet Matching be used for non-IP protocols?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 7pt; margin-left: 0pt; margin-right: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0pt; text-transform: none;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Arial;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;gt; A.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; No. Flexible Packet Matching cannot inspect non-IP protocols.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But what can I do to filter L2 broadcasts? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:02:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fpm-and-layer-2-broadcasts/m-p/2134921#M395276</guid>
      <dc:creator>sasha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-28T15:02:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

