<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Interface Access List Traffic Control in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-access-list-traffic-control/m-p/2124081#M395629</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Eric,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So....&amp;nbsp; The question is, how can I get the Interface ACL to be applied to the VPN traffic entering the LAN without disrrupting the wanted VPN traffic? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Actually it should allow it, now traffic innitiated on the other site will need to be allowed on the outside_to_in ACL so you also need to have the permitted traffic there!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:34:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-13T19:34:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interface Access List Traffic Control</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-access-list-traffic-control/m-p/2124080#M395625</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a Production Router that is hosting 30+ IPSec Tunnels.&amp;nbsp; I have an ACL on the inside Interface of the Router to stop unwanted traffic from entering our LAN via the Tunnels.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current ACL looks like this: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 deny&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 3389&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 deny&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 135&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 deny&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 137&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 deny&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 138&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 deny&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 139&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 deny&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 445&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 deny&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 389&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 permit ip any any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group 145 out interface Internal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configured this way, the traffic that I do not want (ie RDP) is not allowed from 192.168.30.0 to 10.187.10.0.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like it to look more like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 deny&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tcp any any eq 3389&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 deny&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tcp any any eq 135&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 deny&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tcp any any eq 137&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 deny&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tcp any any eq 138&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 deny&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tcp any any eq 139&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 deny&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tcp any any eq 445&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 deny&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tcp any any eq 389&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 145 permit ip any any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group 145 out interface Internal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I know that the unwanted traffic could be limited by making the individual Crypto Map ACL's for the Tunnels more restrictive, but that is a logistical nightmare that I am not prepared to undertake at this time....&amp;nbsp; I am reasonably sure that the proposed ACL would work fine for my purposes on the Router.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Trick is that I want to move all of the IPSec Tunnels to a HA pair of ASA's.&amp;nbsp; In the ASA the syopt connection permit-vpn&amp;nbsp; allows the Crypto Map ACL to override the interface ACL.&amp;nbsp; It was proposed to use the no sysopt connection permit-vpn command, which it was hoped would allow the Interface ACL to be compared against the VPN Traffic entering the LAN, but it does not!&amp;nbsp; It essentially blocks &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;all&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; traffic from entering the LAN despite the permit ip any any at the end of the ACL.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So....&amp;nbsp; The question is, how can I get the Interface ACL to be applied to the VPN traffic entering the LAN without disrrupting the wanted VPN traffic?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:22:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-access-list-traffic-control/m-p/2124080#M395625</guid>
      <dc:creator>IT_-_Department</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T00:22:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interface Access List Traffic Control</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-access-list-traffic-control/m-p/2124081#M395629</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Eric,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So....&amp;nbsp; The question is, how can I get the Interface ACL to be applied to the VPN traffic entering the LAN without disrrupting the wanted VPN traffic? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Actually it should allow it, now traffic innitiated on the other site will need to be allowed on the outside_to_in ACL so you also need to have the permitted traffic there!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:34:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-access-list-traffic-control/m-p/2124081#M395629</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-13T19:34:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

