<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Trying to us object-group and PAT in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trying-to-us-object-group-and-pat/m-p/2124026#M395643</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is just the name&amp;nbsp; ( and yes they used that name because of that) but it can also be used on a singular nat ( I mean no use of the destination keyword)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-13T22:01:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Trying to us object-group and PAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trying-to-us-object-group-and-pat/m-p/2124021#M395628</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to configure dynamic PAT on a Cisco ASA 5510 using an object-group and having difficulty.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I use an object-group, which includes five subnets, as a source for NATing to a dynamic PAT address?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:22:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trying-to-us-object-group-and-pat/m-p/2124021#M395628</guid>
      <dc:creator>weichenb2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T00:22:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trying to us object-group and PAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trying-to-us-object-group-and-pat/m-p/2124022#M395632</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Okay so you already created the object-group ( Let's say it's called &lt;STRONG&gt;internal_subnets&lt;/STRONG&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So nat should be :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside,outside) source dynamic &lt;STRONG&gt;internal_subnets &lt;/STRONG&gt;interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the last example it will get patted to the outside interface, if you want to PAT it to a different IP than the outside interface just create a object network host and use it on the NAT instead of the interface keyword,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:36:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trying-to-us-object-group-and-pat/m-p/2124022#M395632</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-13T19:36:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trying to us object-group and PAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trying-to-us-object-group-and-pat/m-p/2124023#M395634</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should the "nat (inside,outside) source dynamic internal_subnets interface"&lt;STRONG&gt; command be under the object-group?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:45:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trying-to-us-object-group-and-pat/m-p/2124023#M395634</guid>
      <dc:creator>weichenb2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-13T19:45:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trying to us object-group and PAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trying-to-us-object-group-and-pat/m-p/2124024#M395636</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, that command is for twice NAT not auto-nat ( object_nat)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:47:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trying-to-us-object-group-and-pat/m-p/2124024#M395636</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-13T19:47:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trying to us object-group and PAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trying-to-us-object-group-and-pat/m-p/2124025#M395639</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does "twice NAT" mean two-way NAT?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:49:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trying-to-us-object-group-and-pat/m-p/2124025#M395639</guid>
      <dc:creator>weichenb2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-13T21:49:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trying to us object-group and PAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trying-to-us-object-group-and-pat/m-p/2124026#M395643</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is just the name&amp;nbsp; ( and yes they used that name because of that) but it can also be used on a singular nat ( I mean no use of the destination keyword)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/trying-to-us-object-group-and-pat/m-p/2124026#M395643</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-13T22:01:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

