<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Multiple interfaces for Hide NAT issue in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-interfaces-for-hide-nat-issue/m-p/2045107#M398544</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Experts, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm struggling with a NAT config and would appreciate some help to get myself going! Its a Cisco FWSM running version 4 in a 6509. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a requirement to "Hide NAT" traffic coming from a Load Balancer IP behind the interface of the network it is accessing. So far this works fine:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (first_interface) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this example, 10.10.10.10 is the IP that the LB uses to send traffic and when it sends to the servers behind the first_interface it is translated successfully and all is good. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, I need to add a second interface to the mix, so when the LB sends traffic to the second_interface, the traffic is also hidden, but this time its hidden behind the second_interface. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't add a second NAT pool entry that matches the same source IP, as I get a duplicate NAT entry error. If I try adding&amp;nbsp; a second global statement as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (second_interface) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then it also doesn't work - I'm guessing because the NAT process is kicking in before the routing is decided? It's late, so I'm fed up of looking at it. Can someone let me know if I am missing something obvious here!?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any information would be much appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:01:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jonathanaxford</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-12T00:01:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple interfaces for Hide NAT issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-interfaces-for-hide-nat-issue/m-p/2045107#M398544</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Experts, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm struggling with a NAT config and would appreciate some help to get myself going! Its a Cisco FWSM running version 4 in a 6509. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a requirement to "Hide NAT" traffic coming from a Load Balancer IP behind the interface of the network it is accessing. So far this works fine:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (first_interface) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this example, 10.10.10.10 is the IP that the LB uses to send traffic and when it sends to the servers behind the first_interface it is translated successfully and all is good. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, I need to add a second interface to the mix, so when the LB sends traffic to the second_interface, the traffic is also hidden, but this time its hidden behind the second_interface. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't add a second NAT pool entry that matches the same source IP, as I get a duplicate NAT entry error. If I try adding&amp;nbsp; a second global statement as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (second_interface) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then it also doesn't work - I'm guessing because the NAT process is kicking in before the routing is decided? It's late, so I'm fed up of looking at it. Can someone let me know if I am missing something obvious here!?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any information would be much appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:01:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-interfaces-for-hide-nat-issue/m-p/2045107#M398544</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonathanaxford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T00:01:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple interfaces for Hide NAT issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-interfaces-for-hide-nat-issue/m-p/2045108#M398545</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You cannot add the following as the source IP can only live behind one interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (second_interface) 1 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can however add the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (second_interface) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (first_interface) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Kureli&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:17:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-interfaces-for-hide-nat-issue/m-p/2045108#M398545</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kureli Sankar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-08T19:17:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

