<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Best Practice for ASA Route Monitoring Options? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/best-practice-for-asa-route-monitoring-options/m-p/2041958#M403058</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jilio,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I agree with you. But what is the guidelinefor those settings and how I can choose good value for Timeout?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:34:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>snoopyren</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-23T18:34:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best Practice for ASA Route Monitoring Options?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/best-practice-for-asa-route-monitoring-options/m-p/2041954#M403054</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have one pair Cisco ASA 5505 located in different location and there are two point to point links between those two locations, one for primary link (static route w/ low metric) and the other for backup (static route w/ high metric). The tracked options is enabled for monitoring the state of the primary route. the detail parameters regarding options as below, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Frequency: 30 seconds&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Data Size: 28 bytes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Threshold: 3000 milliseconds&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Tos: 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Time out: 3000 milliseconds&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Number of Packets: 8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;------ show run------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sla monitor 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 10.200.200.2 interface Intersite_Traffic&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;num-packets 8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;timeout 3000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;threshold 3000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;frequency 30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sla monitor schedule 1 life forever start-time now&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;------ show run------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure if the setting is so sensitive that the secondary static route begins to work right away, even when some small link flappings occur. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the best practice to set those parameters up in the production environment. How can we specify the reasonanble monitoring options to fit our needs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for any idea.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:12:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/best-practice-for-asa-route-monitoring-options/m-p/2041954#M403054</guid>
      <dc:creator>snoopyren</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T00:12:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Practice for ASA Route Monitoring Options?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/best-practice-for-asa-route-monitoring-options/m-p/2041955#M403055</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Right now you are saying send 8 packets every 30 seconds, and for failover to happen you got to miss 8 packets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I will prefer to use the default setup num-packets 3 frequency 10 so failover happens as fast as possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could change it as your preference,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:39:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/best-practice-for-asa-route-monitoring-options/m-p/2041955#M403055</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-23T17:39:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Best Practice for ASA Route Monitoring Options?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/best-practice-for-asa-route-monitoring-options/m-p/2041956#M403056</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Valid values for Frequency range from 1 to 604800 seconds. The default value is 60 seconds. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Number of Packets, which allows you to choose the number of echo requests to send for each test.Valid values range from 1 to 100. The default value is 1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My concern is if the settings are too sensitive for some unnecessary failover. what is the effect when we tune those parameters up?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Julio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:00:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/best-practice-for-asa-route-monitoring-options/m-p/2041956#M403056</guid>
      <dc:creator>snoopyren</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-23T18:00:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Best Practice for ASA Route Monitoring Options?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/best-practice-for-asa-route-monitoring-options/m-p/2041957#M403057</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course too sensitive might cause failover to happen when some packets get lost, but remember the whole purpose of this is to provide as less downtime to your network as possible,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now if you tune these parameters what happen is that failover will be triggered on a different time basis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is taken from a cisco document ( If you tune the sla process as this states, 3 packets will be sent each 10 seconds, so 3 of them need to fail to SLA to happen) This CISCO configuration example looks good but there are network engineers that would rather to use a lower time-line than that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE style="font-size: 15.199999809265137px; color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;sla monitor 123
 type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 10.0.0.1 interface outside
 num-packets 3
 frequency 10&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;PRE style="font-size: 15.199999809265137px; color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Remember to rate all of the helpful posts ( If you need assistance knowing how to rate a post just let me know &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/4.5.4/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:06:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/best-practice-for-asa-route-monitoring-options/m-p/2041957#M403057</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-23T18:06:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Best Practice for ASA Route Monitoring Options?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/best-practice-for-asa-route-monitoring-options/m-p/2041958#M403058</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jilio,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I agree with you. But what is the guidelinefor those settings and how I can choose good value for Timeout?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:34:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/best-practice-for-asa-route-monitoring-options/m-p/2041958#M403058</guid>
      <dc:creator>snoopyren</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-23T18:34:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Best Practice for ASA Route Monitoring Options?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/best-practice-for-asa-route-monitoring-options/m-p/2041959#M403059</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's your decision, Guideline is the one Cisco provides, from there you can determine what is good for you and what is not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Remember to rate all of the helpful posts ( If you need assistance knowing how to rate a post just let me know &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:37:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/best-practice-for-asa-route-monitoring-options/m-p/2041959#M403059</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-23T18:37:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

