<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASA actice/standby with subinterface in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-actice-standby-with-subinterface/m-p/830231#M426595</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think you can use a redundant interface but you can not use a subinterface for teh failover link. For stateful failover link you can share even with a regular data link but it is not recommended and the ASA will issue out a warning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:08:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hogoqo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-31T18:08:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA actice/standby with subinterface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-actice-standby-with-subinterface/m-p/830228#M426592</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I try to configure active/standby with ASA5520 Version 8.0(2). In configuration guide I read: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The if_name argument assigns a name to the interface specified by the phy_if argument. The phy_if argument can be the physical port name, such as Ethernet1, or a previously created subinterface, such as Ethernet0/2.3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But when I try to do this, I get an error message:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ERROR: Can not configure failover interface on a shared physical interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is going wrong?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-actice-standby-with-subinterface/m-p/830228#M426592</guid>
      <dc:creator>isk-admin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T09:45:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA actice/standby with subinterface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-actice-standby-with-subinterface/m-p/830229#M426593</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I recall correctly from my ASA setup (about 14 months ago so I could be mistaken), we tried setting our failover interface on a sub-interface and it didnt work. I then took a look at some Cisco documentation and they suggest that you use a dedicated interface for Failover (that is what we did). We have 1 interface for failover, 1 for DMZ, 1 for Outside and 1 for Inside and everything is functioning correctly. I am trying to find the link I used from Cisco when researching this, but I am fairly sure that was what I came up with.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:39:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-actice-standby-with-subinterface/m-p/830229#M426593</guid>
      <dc:creator>conversyschris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-30T15:39:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA actice/standby with subinterface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-actice-standby-with-subinterface/m-p/830230#M426594</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the same experience with the dedicated interface but CISCO said it must work with a subinterface too! I do not like to use one interface only for failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-actice-standby-with-subinterface/m-p/830230#M426594</guid>
      <dc:creator>isk-admin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-31T07:13:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA actice/standby with subinterface</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-actice-standby-with-subinterface/m-p/830231#M426595</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think you can use a redundant interface but you can not use a subinterface for teh failover link. For stateful failover link you can share even with a regular data link but it is not recommended and the ASA will issue out a warning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:08:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-actice-standby-with-subinterface/m-p/830231#M426595</guid>
      <dc:creator>hogoqo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-31T18:08:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

