<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: two ISP's, two ASA's.. right? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-isp-s-two-asa-s-right/m-p/562994#M427239</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes it can be done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The need for doign natting is to safeguard your network from the ISP traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ISP traffic may make your network busy because of large internet tables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 13:03:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aghaznavi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-05-15T13:03:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>two ISP's, two ASA's.. right?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-isp-s-two-asa-s-right/m-p/562993#M427238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have two ISP's.. right now we are maintaining 2 firewall's (one is primarly for mail, the other is everything else).  I wanted to replace them with 2 ASA's in multiple context's with failover.  But in my reading, it says that sharing an inside interface between two contexts means you have to NAT the destiantion address... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can this be done?  Have them as a fail-over pair?  Have ASA1 with 2 contexts, one get's g0/0.1 on the outside and shares g0/1.1 on the inside with ASA2.. then ASA2 get's g0/0.2 from the other ISP... and shares g0/1.1 on the inside.  (Sorry, my ASA interface terminology isn't up to date.. old pix guy trying to get up to speed with the ASA &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it doesn't make sense, I can attach a drawing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TIA,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;bk &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-isp-s-two-asa-s-right/m-p/562993#M427238</guid>
      <dc:creator>bkastor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:53:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: two ISP's, two ASA's.. right?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-isp-s-two-asa-s-right/m-p/562994#M427239</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes it can be done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The need for doign natting is to safeguard your network from the ISP traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ISP traffic may make your network busy because of large internet tables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 13:03:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/two-isp-s-two-asa-s-right/m-p/562994#M427239</guid>
      <dc:creator>aghaznavi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-15T13:03:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

