<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASA 5510! in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5510/m-p/525947#M428706</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i don't think it refers to 2 chassises. it really means it supports failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in fact the main difference between bun-k9 and sec-bun-k9 is the number of interface. bun-k9 has 3 whereas sec-bun-k9 has 5.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regarding the ssm, it doesn't support failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:46:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jackko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-03-17T00:46:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA 5510!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5510/m-p/525945#M428694</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The main difference between Cisco ASA 5510 Firewall Edition Bundle and the Cisco ASA 5510 Security Plus Firewall Edition Bundle (ASA5510-SEC-BUN-K9 ) is that ASA5510-SEC-BUN-K9 comes with two Cisco ASA devices for Active/failover and also 5 FE interfaces and also the price :D? Just to make sure that Cisco ASA 5510 Firewall Edition Bundle is one device (no standby device) and the ASA5510-SEC-BUN-K9 comes with two devices Active/Standby, right?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:46:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5510/m-p/525945#M428694</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.hajhamad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:46:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA 5510!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5510/m-p/525946#M428699</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi again,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i think ASA5510 with IPS (ASA 5510 Appliance with AIP-SSM-10,SW, 3FE, 3DES/AES) is a good solution since i need in IDS, so it is better to have ASA5510 with IPS, again, is (ASA 5510 Appliance with AIP-SSM-10,SW, 3FE, 3DES/AES) comes with two devices active/standby, if yes the IPS SSM can be installed at the primary (active) device, what happens if this active device failed, i.e the secondary (standby) device has no AIP-SSM installed, no ips functionallity?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks in dvance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 22:55:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5510/m-p/525946#M428699</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.hajhamad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-16T22:55:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA 5510!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5510/m-p/525947#M428706</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i don't think it refers to 2 chassises. it really means it supports failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in fact the main difference between bun-k9 and sec-bun-k9 is the number of interface. bun-k9 has 3 whereas sec-bun-k9 has 5.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regarding the ssm, it doesn't support failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:46:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5510/m-p/525947#M428706</guid>
      <dc:creator>jackko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-17T00:46:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA 5510!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5510/m-p/525948#M428711</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;so i need to order another chassis to be standby?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:43:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5510/m-p/525948#M428711</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.hajhamad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-17T08:43:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA 5510!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5510/m-p/525949#M428716</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 16:20:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5510/m-p/525949#M428716</guid>
      <dc:creator>jackko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-17T16:20:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA 5510!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5510/m-p/525950#M428718</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ordered a 5540 and a 5510 for this purpose and it is working well&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 14:16:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5510/m-p/525950#M428718</guid>
      <dc:creator>pjsutton1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-19T14:16:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

