<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: difference between pix 7.0 and asa 7.0  in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-pix-7-0-and-asa-7-0/m-p/452282#M429612</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the PIX security appliance, the failover link can be either a LAN-based connection or a dedicated serial Failover cable. But on the ASA platform, the failover link can only be a LAN-based connection&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pradeepde</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-12-22T19:46:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>difference between pix 7.0 and asa 7.0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-pix-7-0-and-asa-7-0/m-p/452281#M429610</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;couls anyone pls clarify the differnce between asa 7.0 and pix 7.0 ios . i checked with the command reference . bo the ioses have the same commands. i guess the only difference between the two is that the asa can have a inbuilt antivirus and ips engine making it a single box solution . whereas with pix u need to have a external ips. any more differnces pls share. thank u &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sushil &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:35:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-pix-7-0-and-asa-7-0/m-p/452281#M429610</guid>
      <dc:creator>sushilmenon2001</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T08:35:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: difference between pix 7.0 and asa 7.0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-pix-7-0-and-asa-7-0/m-p/452282#M429612</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the PIX security appliance, the failover link can be either a LAN-based connection or a dedicated serial Failover cable. But on the ASA platform, the failover link can only be a LAN-based connection&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-pix-7-0-and-asa-7-0/m-p/452282#M429612</guid>
      <dc:creator>pradeepde</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-12-22T19:46:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: difference between pix 7.0 and asa 7.0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-pix-7-0-and-asa-7-0/m-p/452283#M429614</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sushil,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most of the features are common between these two devices.. One of the most important difference I can see is that PIX V7.0 does not support WebVPN, whereas ASA supports....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just check for the release notes for more information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps... all the best...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raj&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:32:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/difference-between-pix-7-0-and-asa-7-0/m-p/452283#M429614</guid>
      <dc:creator>sachinraja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-12-23T04:32:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

