<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cisco ASA Point-to-Point Stub Configuration in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-point-to-point-stub-configuration/m-p/1925944#M436191</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;All - &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an ASA (US-HEN) on a public IP that is a fiber based connection.&amp;nbsp; Then there is a private point-to-point from the same fiber service company.&amp;nbsp; Both ASA are 5510 in routed mode.&amp;nbsp; The second location (US-LEX) used to have a site-to-site VPN over a DSL connection which has gone away.&amp;nbsp; So now there is a private point-to-point over a /32 subnet and I'm pointing the ASA at US-LEX back to US-HEN as its default gateway.&amp;nbsp; Should I put the second ASA (I'm calling this a 'stub' connection) into transparent mode as opposed to routed?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 23:10:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Pickles</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T23:10:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ASA Point-to-Point Stub Configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-point-to-point-stub-configuration/m-p/1925944#M436191</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All - &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an ASA (US-HEN) on a public IP that is a fiber based connection.&amp;nbsp; Then there is a private point-to-point from the same fiber service company.&amp;nbsp; Both ASA are 5510 in routed mode.&amp;nbsp; The second location (US-LEX) used to have a site-to-site VPN over a DSL connection which has gone away.&amp;nbsp; So now there is a private point-to-point over a /32 subnet and I'm pointing the ASA at US-LEX back to US-HEN as its default gateway.&amp;nbsp; Should I put the second ASA (I'm calling this a 'stub' connection) into transparent mode as opposed to routed?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 23:10:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-point-to-point-stub-configuration/m-p/1925944#M436191</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Pickles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T23:10:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ASA Point-to-Point Stub Configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-point-to-point-stub-configuration/m-p/1925945#M436192</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A quick diagram:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Internet ---- US-HEN outside ---- US-HEN ptp (192.168.0.1) ---- US-LEX ptp (192.168.0.2) ---- US-LEX inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; sec-level 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; sec-level 100&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; sec-level 100&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; sec-level 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have turned on permit inter and intra interface and the following routing exists:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;US-HEN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [public IP gateway]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; ip route 192.168.x.x [US-LEX] 192.168.0.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;US-LEX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should I specify NAT exemptions in both directions for traffic?&amp;nbsp; I would think that I wouldn't need that unless traffic is about to go over a site-to-site VPN tunnel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-point-to-point-stub-configuration/m-p/1925945#M436192</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Pickles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-22T20:08:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ASA Point-to-Point Stub Configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-point-to-point-stub-configuration/m-p/1925946#M436193</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was also thinking about configuring it with 'ip permit any any' statements to allow all of the traffic in/out and disabling NAT.&amp;nbsp; Really I just need it to function like a router at this point and not so much a firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 13:53:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-point-to-point-stub-configuration/m-p/1925946#M436193</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Pickles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-29T13:53:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

