<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Switch bottleneck? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switch-bottleneck/m-p/1911122#M437742</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm installing 2 ASA 5510s, one as the primary and one as the failover.&amp;nbsp; If I use a Netgear 10/100 Fast Ethernet 5 port switch in between the firewalls and the ISP's, will I be creating a bottleneck?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 23:01:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>fullerthaler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T23:01:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Switch bottleneck?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switch-bottleneck/m-p/1911122#M437742</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm installing 2 ASA 5510s, one as the primary and one as the failover.&amp;nbsp; If I use a Netgear 10/100 Fast Ethernet 5 port switch in between the firewalls and the ISP's, will I be creating a bottleneck?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 23:01:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switch-bottleneck/m-p/1911122#M437742</guid>
      <dc:creator>fullerthaler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T23:01:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Switch bottleneck?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switch-bottleneck/m-p/1911123#M437743</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; What is the thruput of the swittch? Also, as it is unmanaged switch, I would n't do that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MS &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 01:58:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switch-bottleneck/m-p/1911123#M437743</guid>
      <dc:creator>mvsheik123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-04T01:58:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Switch bottleneck?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switch-bottleneck/m-p/1911124#M437744</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your ports are all running at 100 Mbps (and your ISP connection is less than that) you shouldn't have any problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you're running a port at 10 Mbps and your ISP speed is more than that - then, yes, your switch will limit your throughput.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 02:05:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switch-bottleneck/m-p/1911124#M437744</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-04T02:05:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

