topic Re: Virtual Exchange & NAT'ing in Network Security https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-exchange-nat-ing/m-p/1881782#M437900 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>yes...that didn't resolve our issue. <span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":confused_face:">😕</span></P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 04 May 2012 15:53:23 GMT waldronks 2012-05-04T15:53:23Z Virtual Exchange & NAT'ing https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-exchange-nat-ing/m-p/1881780#M437897 <P>A virtual server currently has Exchange installed on it with load balancing on our network. Each NIC has its own IP address and they want one external address for it to NAT to.&nbsp; Looking at our ASA, we can't overlap addresses...meaning I get an error when I try to NAT 2 internal addresses to 1 external.&nbsp; How can this be accomplished?</P> Mon, 11 Mar 2019 23:00:00 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-exchange-nat-ing/m-p/1881780#M437897 waldronks 2019-03-11T23:00:00Z Re: Virtual Exchange & NAT'ing https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-exchange-nat-ing/m-p/1881781#M437898 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Have you tried PAT?</P><P></P><P>Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App</P></BODY></HTML> Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:21:14 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-exchange-nat-ing/m-p/1881781#M437898 andrew.prince 2012-04-30T21:21:14Z Re: Virtual Exchange & NAT'ing https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-exchange-nat-ing/m-p/1881782#M437900 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>yes...that didn't resolve our issue. <span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":confused_face:">😕</span></P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 04 May 2012 15:53:23 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-exchange-nat-ing/m-p/1881782#M437900 waldronks 2012-05-04T15:53:23Z Virtual Exchange & NAT'ing https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-exchange-nat-ing/m-p/1881783#M437902 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>What version do you have? It can be done with an special configuration on 8.2. If you are in version 8.3 or higher you may want to look at Many to Few NAT configuration. </P><P></P><P>Mike</P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 04 May 2012 16:30:37 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-exchange-nat-ing/m-p/1881783#M437902 Maykol Rojas 2012-05-04T16:30:37Z Virtual Exchange & NAT'ing https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-exchange-nat-ing/m-p/1881784#M437904 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P> PAT fixes 99% - post your config for review.</P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 04 May 2012 16:45:59 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-exchange-nat-ing/m-p/1881784#M437904 andrew.prince 2012-05-04T16:45:59Z Virtual Exchange & NAT'ing https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-exchange-nat-ing/m-p/1881785#M437905 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>What about inbound traffic on Same services? </P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 04 May 2012 16:47:44 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-exchange-nat-ing/m-p/1881785#M437905 Maykol Rojas 2012-05-04T16:47:44Z