<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Static NAT dmz to inside in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908114#M438062</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Shivaji, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is wrong in any of the two commands. Depends what are you trying to do :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (real_interface,nated_interface) translation_ip translated_ip&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the first case :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (dmz,inside)10.1.1.10 10.2.2.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The host that will be translated is in DMZ and has the IP 10.2.2.10, It will be transted in the INSIDE as 10.1.1.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second case :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,dmz) 10.2.2.10 10.1.1.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The host that will be translated is in INSIDE and has the ip 10.1.1.10, it will be translated in the DMZ as 10.2.2.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:20:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dan-Ciprian Cicioiu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-25T12:20:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Static NAT dmz to inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908113#M438061</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a ASA with Inside (10.1.1.1/24) &amp;amp; DMZ (10.2.2.1/24) Interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to access one of server in DMZ (10.2.2.10) from Inside using NAT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have following NAT command entered&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (dmz,inside)10.1.1.10 10.2.2.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is this syntax correct. If yes, how it is different from following command&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,dmz) 10.2.2.10 10.1.1.10&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:57:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908113#M438061</guid>
      <dc:creator>central_bank</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T22:57:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Static NAT dmz to inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908114#M438062</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Shivaji, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is wrong in any of the two commands. Depends what are you trying to do :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (real_interface,nated_interface) translation_ip translated_ip&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the first case :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (dmz,inside)10.1.1.10 10.2.2.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The host that will be translated is in DMZ and has the IP 10.2.2.10, It will be transted in the INSIDE as 10.1.1.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second case :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,dmz) 10.2.2.10 10.1.1.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The host that will be translated is in INSIDE and has the ip 10.1.1.10, it will be translated in the DMZ as 10.2.2.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:20:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908114#M438062</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dan-Ciprian Cicioiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-25T12:20:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Static NAT dmz to inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908115#M438063</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hi Dan ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any restriction, like real_interface should be of higher security level as that of nated_interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:58:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908115#M438063</guid>
      <dc:creator>central_bank</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-25T12:58:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Static NAT dmz to inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908116#M438064</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi , &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My pleasure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no restriction regarding the real_interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But depending on your software version there is a requirement. In some versions is called NAT-CONTROL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NAT-CONTROL - requires that the traffic from a higher security level to a lower security level , should be source nated in order to be permited - also from a lower to higher the traffic should have the destination translated. Historicaly speaking on PIX , this requirement could not be disabled and you had to do identity nat. Nat-control appeared on the software version 7.x , and currently dissapeard so if you are using a 8.4 software version nat-control it is not present.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:07:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908116#M438064</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dan-Ciprian Cicioiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-25T13:07:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT dmz to inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908117#M438066</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (dmz,inside)10.1.1.10 10.2.2.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when packet with destination IP 10.1.1.10 reaches inside interface of ASA it&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is redirected to 10.2.2.10 on DMZ.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,dmz) 10.2.2.10 10.1.1.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When packet with destination IP 10.2.2.10 hits DMZ it is redirected to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.1.1.10 on inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Regards &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mohammed Imran&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:07:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908117#M438066</guid>
      <dc:creator>imramoha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-25T13:07:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Static NAT dmz to inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908118#M438068</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mohammed, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My understanding on static NAT is that is bidirectional , so it does not matter where the packet was received.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you telling that this is not the case ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:11:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908118#M438068</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dan-Ciprian Cicioiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-25T13:11:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Static NAT dmz to inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908119#M438070</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its kind of the case. Basically one method translates (presents) the source IP and the other the destination IP. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;jon.marshall explans it here: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.cisco.com/thread/239441"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/239441&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ryan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908119#M438070</guid>
      <dc:creator>rgnelson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-27T16:07:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT dmz to inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908120#M438072</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Ryan , &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My post was directed to the fact that the static nat does not change only the DESTINATION.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you can see in my last post , the static nat is bidirectional. This means that taking for example &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (dmz,inside)10.1.1.10 10.2.2.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - if the traffic has been&lt;STRONG&gt; initiated from DMZ&lt;/STRONG&gt; its changes the &lt;STRONG&gt;SOURCE.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - if the traffic has been &lt;STRONG&gt;initiated from INSIDE&lt;/STRONG&gt; its changes the &lt;STRONG&gt;DESTINATION&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the static NAT translates both source OR destination , depending on where the packet was initiated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:44:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-dmz-to-inside/m-p/1908120#M438072</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dan-Ciprian Cicioiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-27T16:44:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

