<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Response from nonexistent IPs in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/response-from-nonexistent-ips/m-p/1894728#M438149</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Good afternoon!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At my work I'm having an interesting issue.&amp;nbsp; I am trying to map out ip space in certain areas of my network through firewalls and determine what IPs are active and not.&amp;nbsp; The issue I am running into is that when I run NMAP or just a regular ping sweep I get a response no matter if there is a device on that IP or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas as to why this is?&amp;nbsp; Is there a config in the firewall that could cause the firewall to respond to any port or ICMP sweep and act as the nonexistent device?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jay&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:57:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>galloway13</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T22:57:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Response from nonexistent IPs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/response-from-nonexistent-ips/m-p/1894728#M438149</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good afternoon!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At my work I'm having an interesting issue.&amp;nbsp; I am trying to map out ip space in certain areas of my network through firewalls and determine what IPs are active and not.&amp;nbsp; The issue I am running into is that when I run NMAP or just a regular ping sweep I get a response no matter if there is a device on that IP or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas as to why this is?&amp;nbsp; Is there a config in the firewall that could cause the firewall to respond to any port or ICMP sweep and act as the nonexistent device?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jay&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:57:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/response-from-nonexistent-ips/m-p/1894728#M438149</guid>
      <dc:creator>galloway13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T22:57:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Response from nonexistent IPs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/response-from-nonexistent-ips/m-p/1894729#M438150</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the firewall has a static NAT rule it will respond to a ping on behalf of the true device IP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:54:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/response-from-nonexistent-ips/m-p/1894729#M438150</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-24T00:54:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Response from nonexistent IPs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/response-from-nonexistent-ips/m-p/1894730#M438151</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are no static NAT rules currently in the device. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:49:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/response-from-nonexistent-ips/m-p/1894730#M438151</guid>
      <dc:creator>galloway13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-25T13:49:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

