<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic L2L with single address in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/l2l-with-single-address/m-p/2054190#M438288</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Hamad,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please include the packet-tracer output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;packet-tracer input inside icmp 192.168.1.50 8 0 10.5.225.10 detail&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Portu. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/4.5.4/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:50:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Javier Portuguez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-24T18:50:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>L2L with single address</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/l2l-with-single-address/m-p/2054189#M438287</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I know this has been asked a million times on the internet and for the life of me i can't figure out what seems to be happening here. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR style="font-size: 14px; font-family: 'Droid Serif', Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; color: #222222; line-height: 23px; background-color: #ffffff;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have multiple networks on an ASA and we are now requested to setup a site to site with a vendor. In my past experience, i have always done site to site with NO NAT however the vendor requires us to pass all traffic from our inside networks (overlapping) to NAT address of single host 192.168.148.x &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR style="font-size: 14px; font-family: 'Droid Serif', Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; color: #222222; line-height: 23px; background-color: #ffffff;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everytime i am adding static (inside,outside) 192.168.140.x access-list policy-nat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I keep getting global address overlaps mask. Here is more details of what i am looking for: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR style="font-size: 14px; font-family: 'Droid Serif', Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; color: #222222; line-height: 23px; background-color: #ffffff;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Inside range: 192.168.0.x / 24, 10.100.0.x/22&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Destination host: 10.5.225.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Provider requested NAT: 192.168.148.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR style="font-size: 14px; font-family: 'Droid Serif', Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; color: #222222; line-height: 23px; background-color: #ffffff;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the config i have on my end, any help would be appreciated: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR style="font-size: 14px; font-family: 'Droid Serif', Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; color: #222222; line-height: 23px; background-color: #ffffff;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list VPN-TO-VENDOR extended permit ip host 192.168.148.x host 10.5.225.x &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list policynat extended permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 host 10.5.225.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Phase 2 is completed however no traffic is passing. When checking the ACL's there is no hit count either. I have tried to use static (inside,outside) 192.168.148.x access-list policynat and i keep getting global address overlaps mask. I am stuck any help would be appreciated. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 23:58:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/l2l-with-single-address/m-p/2054189#M438287</guid>
      <dc:creator>hamadriaz1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T23:58:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>L2L with single address</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/l2l-with-single-address/m-p/2054190#M438288</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Hamad,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please include the packet-tracer output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;packet-tracer input inside icmp 192.168.1.50 8 0 10.5.225.10 detail&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Portu. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/4.5.4/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:50:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/l2l-with-single-address/m-p/2054190#M438288</guid>
      <dc:creator>Javier Portuguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-24T18:50:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

