<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Incoming Services Failed when enabling ip verify reverse-path in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/incoming-services-failed-when-enabling-ip-verify-reverse-path/m-p/1969846#M440187</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correct, having 2 default routes on ASA towards 2 different interfaces are not a supported configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the doc for your reference:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa84/configuration/guide/route_static.html#wp1128007"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa84/configuration/guide/route_static.html#wp1128007&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Quoted from the doc:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; If you attempt to define more than three equal cost default routes or&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; a&amp;nbsp; default route with a different interface than a previously defined&amp;nbsp; default route&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;, you receive the following message: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;A name="wp1123744"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;"ERROR: Cannot add route entry, possible conflict with existing routes." 
&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:19:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-03T13:19:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Incoming Services Failed when enabling ip verify reverse-path</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/incoming-services-failed-when-enabling-ip-verify-reverse-path/m-p/1969843#M440182</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently we are running one ISP which incoming and outgoing traffice will go throught the ISP, lets call it ISP1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have this VC network and the traffic are very low and we was thinking to shift the web services incoming traffice to this traffic, lets call it ISP2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created a test web server for testing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thing that i have done for the test environment:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Create new interface (outside2) for ISP1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Create ACL to allowed the test web server http port&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Create static NAT for the test web server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. Static Route the outside2 interface to ISP2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Attach is the simple diagram that i has created.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everything worked fine until I enabled the "ip verify reverse-path outside2". The test web no longer can access from outside. But when i turn the feature off, it was able to access again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is why this will happen? Is there particular setting i need to take note or change in order to use the reverse-path?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any advise are very helpful.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 23:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/incoming-services-failed-when-enabling-ip-verify-reverse-path/m-p/1969843#M440182</guid>
      <dc:creator>Boon Keat Gan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T23:25:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Incoming Services Failed when enabling ip verify reverse-path</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/incoming-services-failed-when-enabling-ip-verify-reverse-path/m-p/1969844#M440183</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not too sure how it works as you can't have 2 default gateway configured on an ASA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And when you enabled "ip verify reverse-path" since you have 2 outside interfaces with 0.0.0.0 route, then it can't really check against the routing table for the source subnet as you have 2 different interfaces with the same route.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 12:48:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/incoming-services-failed-when-enabling-ip-verify-reverse-path/m-p/1969844#M440183</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-02T12:48:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Incoming Services Failed when enabling ip verify reverse-path</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/incoming-services-failed-when-enabling-ip-verify-reverse-path/m-p/1969845#M440186</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jennifer,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the clarification, but the route we set is based on interface. Example:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 203.1.1.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route outside2 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 203.2.1.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will it conflict with each other too?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 05:08:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/incoming-services-failed-when-enabling-ip-verify-reverse-path/m-p/1969845#M440186</guid>
      <dc:creator>Boon Keat Gan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-03T05:08:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Incoming Services Failed when enabling ip verify reverse-path</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/incoming-services-failed-when-enabling-ip-verify-reverse-path/m-p/1969846#M440187</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correct, having 2 default routes on ASA towards 2 different interfaces are not a supported configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the doc for your reference:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa84/configuration/guide/route_static.html#wp1128007"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa84/configuration/guide/route_static.html#wp1128007&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Quoted from the doc:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; If you attempt to define more than three equal cost default routes or&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; a&amp;nbsp; default route with a different interface than a previously defined&amp;nbsp; default route&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;, you receive the following message: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;A name="wp1123744"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;"ERROR: Cannot add route entry, possible conflict with existing routes." 
&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:19:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/incoming-services-failed-when-enabling-ip-verify-reverse-path/m-p/1969846#M440187</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-03T13:19:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

