<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic We've done two 6.0.1 in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/recommendations-on-6-0-1/m-p/2914708#M44030</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We've done two 6.0.1 production deployments so far with no issues (knock on wood). One of them medium sized and one relatively large (~4000 users on a campus with a 1 Gbps Internet pipe that's running near max).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I also had no issues setting it up in our lab.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know it went through a pretty extended shakedown with the FTD image early experience&amp;nbsp;beta program&amp;nbsp;that started last fall.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 23:20:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-12T23:20:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Recommendations on 6.0.1</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/recommendations-on-6-0-1/m-p/2914707#M44027</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We've been running 6.0.0.1 for a month or so and we've encountered quite a few issues/bugs. &amp;nbsp;We upgraded to the 6.x train at the suggestion of TAC to fix an issue in 5.4 we were having. &amp;nbsp;Because of all the bugs we've hit, and the impact of some of them, I'm trying to be a little more selective on upgrades/patches. &amp;nbsp;Any suggestion on the stability of 6.0.1 for the ASA SFR modules and FMC? &amp;nbsp;Anybody actually running it yet?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 13:35:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/recommendations-on-6-0-1/m-p/2914707#M44027</guid>
      <dc:creator>Christopher Bell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T13:35:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We've done two 6.0.1</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/recommendations-on-6-0-1/m-p/2914708#M44030</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We've done two 6.0.1 production deployments so far with no issues (knock on wood). One of them medium sized and one relatively large (~4000 users on a campus with a 1 Gbps Internet pipe that's running near max).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I also had no issues setting it up in our lab.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know it went through a pretty extended shakedown with the FTD image early experience&amp;nbsp;beta program&amp;nbsp;that started last fall.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 23:20:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/recommendations-on-6-0-1/m-p/2914708#M44030</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-12T23:20:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks Marvin - were these</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/recommendations-on-6-0-1/m-p/2914709#M44034</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Marvin - were these new deployments or upgrades from previous versions?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:13:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/recommendations-on-6-0-1/m-p/2914709#M44034</guid>
      <dc:creator>Christopher Bell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-13T12:13:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Christopher,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/recommendations-on-6-0-1/m-p/2914710#M44037</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Christopher,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The production deployments were greenfield - new FirePOWER instances built from scratch as VMs. Our lab was an upgrade. That's also a VM and has gone from 5.2-5.3-5.4-6.0-6.0.1 over the past several years. It's managing a 5506 and 3D7120.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:43:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/recommendations-on-6-0-1/m-p/2914710#M44037</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-13T13:43:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ok, thanks.  I read something</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/recommendations-on-6-0-1/m-p/2914711#M44039</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, thanks.&amp;nbsp; I read something on a separate post earlier today about issues with Variable Sets in the new release so I may wait for a minor patch to 6.0.1 before moving to it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:12:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/recommendations-on-6-0-1/m-p/2914711#M44039</guid>
      <dc:creator>Christopher Bell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-13T14:12:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>There are several issues that</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/recommendations-on-6-0-1/m-p/2914712#M44043</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are several issues that got fixed in the latest releases. Here is the release notes if you would like to refer and it also contains the details of the bugs that&amp;nbsp;got fixed in the release.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/firepower/601/relnotes/firepower-system-release-notes-version-601.html" class="URL"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/firepower/601/relnotes/firepower-system-release-notes-version-601.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="pB2_Body2"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="cXref_Color"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="pB2_Body2"&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 11:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/recommendations-on-6-0-1/m-p/2914712#M44043</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jetsy Mathew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-23T11:50:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

