<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Nmap vs Firesight in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nmap-vs-firesight/m-p/2783049#M44352</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;How can I enable Firesight to detect Nmap activity. It detects only with specific nmap keys. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 13:31:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>oyeroshe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-10T13:31:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Nmap vs Firesight</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nmap-vs-firesight/m-p/2783049#M44352</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How can I enable Firesight to detect Nmap activity. It detects only with specific nmap keys. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 13:31:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nmap-vs-firesight/m-p/2783049#M44352</guid>
      <dc:creator>oyeroshe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T13:31:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This really depends on what</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nmap-vs-firesight/m-p/2783050#M44353</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This really depends on what you want do detect.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;NMAP is not ment to be&amp;nbsp;detectable. There is no "application detector" for custom crafted packages on a network. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 06:45:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nmap-vs-firesight/m-p/2783050#M44353</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Perto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-17T06:45:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello ,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nmap-vs-firesight/m-p/2783051#M44354</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You should probably give some more details here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What you mean by nmap activity here ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We dont have any application detector specifically for nmap.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jetsy&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 08:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nmap-vs-firesight/m-p/2783051#M44354</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jetsy Mathew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-17T08:08:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I have the same problem, I'm</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nmap-vs-firesight/m-p/2783052#M44355</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have the same problem, I'm using NMAP to do port scan on a single host and I can get all the information of all ports open on that specific host.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I enabled the pre-processor for port scan and enabled the IPS rules with GIP 122:1-122:27. But I can still scan hosts going thought the firepower.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 19:32:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nmap-vs-firesight/m-p/2783052#M44355</guid>
      <dc:creator>guibarati</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-07T19:32:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

