<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Failover software license in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-software-license/m-p/39909#M444254</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In number 2 - "Having a standalone PIX with a FO license probably pass traffic, you need a restricted or UR license" - I hope is understood to me no, a standalone needs a restricted or UR license.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Typing issues:)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:47:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>steve.barlow</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-09-27T16:47:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Failover software license</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-software-license/m-p/39904#M444249</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Since there are not any differences in RAM or interface limits betwen an unrestricted and a failover license, how do you know if you have a failover license running on a Pix?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RJ&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:15:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-software-license/m-p/39904#M444249</guid>
      <dc:creator>r-remien</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T06:15:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover software license</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-software-license/m-p/39905#M444250</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it that it will not pass traffic without another UR Pix?  Can you tell by the activation key?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RJ&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:30:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-software-license/m-p/39905#M444250</guid>
      <dc:creator>r-remien</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-26T16:30:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover software license</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-software-license/m-p/39906#M444251</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do a show version and see licensed features:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pixfirewall# sh ver&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.2(1)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco PIX Device Manager Version 2.0(2)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Compiled on Wed 17-Apr-02 21:18 by morlee&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pixfirewall up 98 days 2 hours&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hardware:   PIX-525, 128 MB RAM, CPU Pentium III 600 MHz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Flash E28F128J3 @ 0x300, 16MB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BIOS Flash AM29F400B @ 0xfffd8000, 32KB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Encryption hardware device : IRE2141 with 2048KB, HW:1.0, CGXROM:1.9, FW:6.5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0: ethernet0: address is 0007.0ee6.7cfe, irq 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1: ethernet1: address is 0007.0ee6.7cff, irq 11&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2: ethernet2: address is 00e0.b604.80d9, irq 11&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3: ethernet3: address is 00e0.b604.80d8, irq 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4: ethernet4: address is 00e0.b604.80d7, irq 9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5: ethernet5: address is 00e0.b604.80d6, irq 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Licensed Features:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Failover:           Enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VPN-DES:            Enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VPN-3DES:           Enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maximum Interfaces: 8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cut-through Proxy:  Enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Guards:             Enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;URL-filtering:      Enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Inside Hosts:       Unlimited&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Throughput:         Unlimited&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IKE peers:          Unlimited&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Serial Number: xxxxxxxxxx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Running Activation Key: xxxx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configuration last modified by xxxxx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:45:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-software-license/m-p/39906#M444251</guid>
      <dc:creator>steve.barlow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-26T16:45:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover software license</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-software-license/m-p/39907#M444252</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the same output as my unrestricted firewall.  The failover license is enabled.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.   What is the difference in the failover vs unrestricted "sh ver"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.  Also, will a standalone Pix with a failover license pass traffic?  Is there something in the license that looks for another Pix?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RJ&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:59:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-software-license/m-p/39907#M444252</guid>
      <dc:creator>r-remien</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-27T14:59:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover software license</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-software-license/m-p/39908#M444253</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. In a failover model, one of the failover units must have an Unrestricted license (UR - means can have more interfaces than restricted and can have failover), while the other can have a Failover (FO) or UR license. Restricted units cannot be used for failover and two units with FO licenses cannot be used in a single failover pair. The PIX 515, PIX 515E, PIX 525, and PIX 535 can be used for failover if you have the optional Unrestricted license.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In 6.2 to see the license enter show activation-key.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Having a standalone PIX with a FO license probably pass traffic, you need a &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;restricted or UR license.  FO can only be used with failover (ie another UR licensed pix).  Don't quote me on this but I believe the FO pix, when it becomes active after the primary does down, uses (same way it knows the config of the active pix) the UR license of the UR active pix to enable it to pass traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:00:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-software-license/m-p/39908#M444253</guid>
      <dc:creator>steve.barlow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-27T16:00:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover software license</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-software-license/m-p/39909#M444254</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In number 2 - "Having a standalone PIX with a FO license probably pass traffic, you need a restricted or UR license" - I hope is understood to me no, a standalone needs a restricted or UR license.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Typing issues:)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:47:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-software-license/m-p/39909#M444254</guid>
      <dc:creator>steve.barlow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-27T16:47:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover software license</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-software-license/m-p/39910#M444255</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK, I understand your points and they make sense.  I guess I am not sure my initial question has been clearly answered.  - How can I tell if I have a FO license? 3 possibilities?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.  Sh ver - what identifies it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.  Serial number? Any part of it identifies it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3.  Purchasing a FO license and knowing it has to be in a redundant pair?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry to belabor this point, I just want to make sure I know what to look for.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RJ&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2002 04:19:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-software-license/m-p/39910#M444255</guid>
      <dc:creator>r-remien</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-28T04:19:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

