<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Looking for Clarification on ASA 5510 Interface Identification a in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/looking-for-clarification-on-asa-5510-interface-identification/m-p/1925901#M456910</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thank you.&amp;nbsp; I was pretty sure and verfied we do have the Security Plus License.&amp;nbsp; Was just confusing since I thought it might change the interface names for e0/0 and e0/1 to GigabitEthernet.&amp;nbsp; Oh well, just have to remember it is only those two interfaces.&amp;nbsp; Would be nice if all 4 were able to be used as Gig or at least 3 of the 4 (inside, outside, dmz).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:07:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>matthewap</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-18T20:07:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Looking for Clarification on ASA 5510 Interface Identification and Speed Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/looking-for-clarification-on-asa-5510-interface-identification/m-p/1925899#M456901</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an ASA 5510 with the security plus module to provide Gig speed on our interfaces.&amp;nbsp; We are migrating from a Pix 515E and I have the Pix-To-ASA Migration tool to assist.&amp;nbsp; What is confusing to me is looking at the ASA in a factory configurtion, the interfaces all display as Ethernet0/0-Ethernet0/3.&amp;nbsp; I would've thought these interfaces labels would be GigabitEthernet0/0-GigabitEthernet0/3?&amp;nbsp; We have the latest software loaded (asa843-k8.bin/asdm-647.bin).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I run a show int e0/0 it displays:&amp;nbsp; Interface Ethernet0/0 "", is up, line protocol is up Hadware is i82546GB rev03, BW 1000 Mbps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Was there some change in the software that removed the Gigabit and now just calls all the interfaces Ethernet?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking at the hardware interface properties via ASDM shows Auto, 10, 100, 1000 as optoins with regard to speed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just trying to make sure something isn't wrong with the ASA before I fully configure the device.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matt&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:55:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/looking-for-clarification-on-asa-5510-interface-identification/m-p/1925899#M456901</guid>
      <dc:creator>matthewap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T22:55:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Looking for Clarification on ASA 5510 Interface Identification a</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/looking-for-clarification-on-asa-5510-interface-identification/m-p/1925900#M456905</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Matt,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With security plus license on the ASA 5510, you would have eth0/0 and eth0/1 as gig ports. Although the Ethernet 0/0 and 0/1 ports are Gigabit Ethernet, they are still identified as "Ethernet" in the software. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This license document would make it clear for you:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa82/license/license82.html#wp190062"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa82/license/license82.html#wp190062&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this is the info you were looking for.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Varun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:05:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/looking-for-clarification-on-asa-5510-interface-identification/m-p/1925900#M456905</guid>
      <dc:creator>varrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-18T18:05:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Looking for Clarification on ASA 5510 Interface Identification a</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/looking-for-clarification-on-asa-5510-interface-identification/m-p/1925901#M456910</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thank you.&amp;nbsp; I was pretty sure and verfied we do have the Security Plus License.&amp;nbsp; Was just confusing since I thought it might change the interface names for e0/0 and e0/1 to GigabitEthernet.&amp;nbsp; Oh well, just have to remember it is only those two interfaces.&amp;nbsp; Would be nice if all 4 were able to be used as Gig or at least 3 of the 4 (inside, outside, dmz).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:07:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/looking-for-clarification-on-asa-5510-interface-identification/m-p/1925901#M456910</guid>
      <dc:creator>matthewap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-18T20:07:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

