<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic possible with nat ? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-nat/m-p/1919940#M456935</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can use a single public IP address to forward different ports to different hosts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But you cant ofcourse forward the same port to multiple hosts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you need help provide some more information what you are trying to achieve.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jouni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jouni Forss</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-18T06:40:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>possible with nat ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-nat/m-p/1919939#M456933</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to staticaally nat one public ip with multiple lan ip with diffrent services?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:55:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-nat/m-p/1919939#M456933</guid>
      <dc:creator>prashantrecon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T22:55:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>possible with nat ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-nat/m-p/1919940#M456935</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can use a single public IP address to forward different ports to different hosts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But you cant ofcourse forward the same port to multiple hosts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you need help provide some more information what you are trying to achieve.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jouni&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-nat/m-p/1919940#M456935</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jouni Forss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-18T06:40:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>possible with nat ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-nat/m-p/1919941#M456937</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes , you can using static nat.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip nat source static tcp x.x.x.x&amp;nbsp; 23 y.y.y.y 23&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip nat source static tcp x.x.x.x&amp;nbsp; 80 y.y.y.z 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip nat source static tcp x.x.x.x&amp;nbsp; 443 y.y.y.h 443&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip nat source static tcp x.x.x.x&amp;nbsp; 22 y.y.y.u 22&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:06:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-nat/m-p/1919941#M456937</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dan-Ciprian Cicioiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-18T07:06:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>possible with nat ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-nat/m-p/1919942#M456938</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Dan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Isthe port redirection&amp;nbsp; concept ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:22:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-nat/m-p/1919942#M456938</guid>
      <dc:creator>prashantrecon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-18T07:22:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>possible with nat ?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-nat/m-p/1919943#M456939</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Prashant, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, the x.x.x.x is the public and y.y.y. are the private/inside addresses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:24:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/possible-with-nat/m-p/1919943#M456939</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dan-Ciprian Cicioiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-18T07:24:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

