<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA Failover on Etherchannel Subinterfaces in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-on-etherchannel-subinterfaces/m-p/1854698#M459113</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa84/configuration/guide/ha_overview.html#wp1077563"&gt;configuration guide&lt;/A&gt; (emphasis in mine):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"You can use &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;any unused interface&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; on the device as the failover link; however, you cannot specify an interface that is currently configured with a name. The failover link interface is not configured as a normal networking interface; it exists for failover communication only. This interface should only be used for the failover link (and optionally for the Stateful Failover link)."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using an Etherchannel for failover should work (reference &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa84/configuration/guide/interface_start.html#wp1326437"&gt;Failover Guidelines&lt;/A&gt; for Etherchannels) but subinterfaces no. I would say the parent interface that your attempted failover subinterface belongs to (along with the other active subinterfaces you mentioned) would make it a &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;used&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:02:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-20T20:02:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA Failover on Etherchannel Subinterfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-on-etherchannel-subinterfaces/m-p/1854697#M459111</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hey - &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;anybody figured out how to use Subinterfaces on an Etherchannel for a Lan Failover link?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I successfully bundled e0/0-1 and e0/2-3 to 2 Port-Channels with a 3750X Stack - and was able to set my "nameifs" and "security level" on Port-Channel Subinterfaces like "Port-channel1.4" As a lan based failover link the subinterfaces seem&amp;nbsp; to be unusable ....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;am I missing something?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Robert &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:32:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-on-etherchannel-subinterfaces/m-p/1854697#M459111</guid>
      <dc:creator>robertblasey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T22:32:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASA Failover on Etherchannel Subinterfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-on-etherchannel-subinterfaces/m-p/1854698#M459113</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa84/configuration/guide/ha_overview.html#wp1077563"&gt;configuration guide&lt;/A&gt; (emphasis in mine):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"You can use &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;any unused interface&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; on the device as the failover link; however, you cannot specify an interface that is currently configured with a name. The failover link interface is not configured as a normal networking interface; it exists for failover communication only. This interface should only be used for the failover link (and optionally for the Stateful Failover link)."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using an Etherchannel for failover should work (reference &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa84/configuration/guide/interface_start.html#wp1326437"&gt;Failover Guidelines&lt;/A&gt; for Etherchannels) but subinterfaces no. I would say the parent interface that your attempted failover subinterface belongs to (along with the other active subinterfaces you mentioned) would make it a &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;used&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:02:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-on-etherchannel-subinterfaces/m-p/1854698#M459113</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-20T20:02:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

