<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 2 Wan Links in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/2-wan-links/m-p/1827698#M459315</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, it is intersting and that the whole point it is risky as well in a production environement, since its not a supported configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Varun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please do rate helpful posts&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:59:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>varrao</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-16T18:59:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>2 Wan Links</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/2-wan-links/m-p/1827695#M459307</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'am using ASA5510 and I would like to know if we can configured 2 WAN Links which work simultaneously.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I explain, &lt;BR /&gt;Actually we have 1 WAN, 1 DMZ and 1 LAN. The WAN links is a SDSL 2M link.We want to add a simple ADSL Wan link only for HTTP Access.&lt;BR /&gt;The Users go out on the Internet thanks to a LAN Proxy configured in the users Internet Browser.&lt;BR /&gt;The ACL in the ASA only allowed this Proxy Address to use port 80.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to add a second WAN link and to configure the Firewall in a way that the Proxy Address only used this Link ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:30:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/2-wan-links/m-p/1827695#M459307</guid>
      <dc:creator>avburren1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T22:30:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2 Wan Links</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/2-wan-links/m-p/1827696#M459309</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the requirement is a bit tricky here, since ASA does not support load-balancing that you are planning to do, reason being, first, there can only be one default route on the ASA, two you cannot do source based routing on the ASA. I would say it is a not supported thing, but just a workaround, which you can try but its your call. Check this doc;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-wiki-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-15622"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-15622&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Varun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:19:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/2-wan-links/m-p/1827696#M459309</guid>
      <dc:creator>varrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-16T14:19:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2 Wan Links</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/2-wan-links/m-p/1827697#M459313</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the doc. I think I will not try to apply the workaround in a production environnement. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But It's Interresting to read it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:21:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/2-wan-links/m-p/1827697#M459313</guid>
      <dc:creator>avburren1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-16T16:21:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2 Wan Links</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/2-wan-links/m-p/1827698#M459315</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, it is intersting and that the whole point it is risky as well in a production environement, since its not a supported configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Varun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please do rate helpful posts&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:59:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/2-wan-links/m-p/1827698#M459315</guid>
      <dc:creator>varrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-16T18:59:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

