<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic failover link in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-link/m-p/1808329#M459456</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;if using a lan based vlan failover ( over a layer 2 switch ) , is there a way to prevent active-active failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:23:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>suthomas1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-14T19:23:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>failover link</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-link/m-p/1808327#M459454</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On an ASA 5520 active, standby pair, what will result if the failover link or interface goes down or fails. Will both devices become active?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If yes, how to prevent this. We want it in such a way that if such a situation happens, there should be only Active and the other one should be standby.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:29:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-link/m-p/1808327#M459454</guid>
      <dc:creator>suthomas1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T22:29:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>failover link</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-link/m-p/1808328#M459455</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; If ASA units connected with cross over then no failover will take place.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; if using LAN based failover then you will end up with Active-Active and traffic will fail.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ajay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:14:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-link/m-p/1808328#M459455</guid>
      <dc:creator>ajay chauhan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-14T17:14:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>failover link</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-link/m-p/1808329#M459456</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;if using a lan based vlan failover ( over a layer 2 switch ) , is there a way to prevent active-active failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:23:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-link/m-p/1808329#M459456</guid>
      <dc:creator>suthomas1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-14T19:23:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

