<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FWSM security level in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-security-level/m-p/1869238#M459548</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:43:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>arpportoPereira</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-18T13:43:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FWSM security level</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-security-level/m-p/1869236#M459543</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I needed to block traffic between some VLANs by default in the same context of fwsm. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I remove the permission that allows traffic between VLANs with the same level of security (same-security-traffic permit inter-interface) and put those VLANs with the same level and automatically block the traffic between them, the rest of the Vlans I can put them with different security levels, and allow the communication between them, is this good practice? There are any restrictions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the help&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:28:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-security-level/m-p/1869236#M459543</guid>
      <dc:creator>arpportoPereira</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T22:28:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FWSM security level</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-security-level/m-p/1869237#M459545</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Yup thats the way it should be once you remove -same-security-traffic permit inter-interface no communication will be there between even they do have same security level. I dont think there should be any issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:55:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-security-level/m-p/1869237#M459545</guid>
      <dc:creator>ajay chauhan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-13T12:55:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FWSM security level</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-security-level/m-p/1869238#M459548</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:43:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-security-level/m-p/1869238#M459548</guid>
      <dc:creator>arpportoPereira</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-18T13:43:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FWSM security level</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-security-level/m-p/1869239#M459550</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi can you please guide me how FWSM is configured in your environment actually I need to deploy FWSM in transparent mode in my environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ambivert SKill&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 21:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-security-level/m-p/1869239#M459550</guid>
      <dc:creator>ambivert skill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-21T21:30:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

