<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Are we using NAT in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/are-we-using-nat/m-p/1852011#M488684</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a VPN conenction with a business partner. I need to know if our ASA is NATin'g the traffic to their router.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>1salvarez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T22:14:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Are we using NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/are-we-using-nat/m-p/1852011#M488684</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a VPN conenction with a business partner. I need to know if our ASA is NATin'g the traffic to their router.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/are-we-using-nat/m-p/1852011#M488684</guid>
      <dc:creator>1salvarez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T22:14:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are we using NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/are-we-using-nat/m-p/1852012#M488685</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please provide us the show run nat:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you see a nat like this nat ( inside) 0 access-list xxxxx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please provide the show run access-list xxxx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:13:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/are-we-using-nat/m-p/1852012#M488685</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-13T19:13:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are we using NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/are-we-using-nat/m-p/1852013#M488686</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Changed the first octet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 0 access-list inside_nat0_outbound&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 99 111.16.1.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 99 112.16.2.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 99 113.168.1.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 99 114.168.2.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 99 115.168.6.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 99 116.168.7.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 99 117.168.8.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 99 118.168.20.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 99 119.168.21.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 99 120.168.22.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 99 121.168.23.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 99 122.168.24.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 99 123.168.25.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 99 124.168.4.0 255.255.254.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 99 125.20.0.0 255.255.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:45:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/are-we-using-nat/m-p/1852013#M488686</guid>
      <dc:creator>1salvarez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-13T19:45:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are we using NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/are-we-using-nat/m-p/1852014#M488688</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ASA is not making translation just on the traffic related to ACL inside_nat0_outbound, So VPN traffic should be in that ACL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please rate helpful posts&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:48:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/are-we-using-nat/m-p/1852014#M488688</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-13T19:48:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

