<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Using Static NAT for network and host in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-static-nat-for-network-and-host/m-p/1843784#M488737</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thanks for the help!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:04:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ROD FRANKLIN</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-12T20:04:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using Static NAT for network and host</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-static-nat-for-network-and-host/m-p/1843782#M488734</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to use a static NAT for a network and then a different one for a host within that network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 10.10.10.0 10.10.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;---so that all 10.10.10.0 address are seen on outside as themselves----&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 10.10.10.5 11.11.11.5 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;---so that 10.10.10.5 host is NAT'ed to different address---&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:13:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-static-nat-for-network-and-host/m-p/1843782#M488734</guid>
      <dc:creator>ROD FRANKLIN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T22:13:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using Static NAT for network and host</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-static-nat-for-network-and-host/m-p/1843783#M488735</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Rod,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes it is very much possible, the more specific one will take the precedence over the other static nat for the network,&amp;nbsp; , to verify it you can also run a packet tracer for it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Packet-tracer input outside tcp 4.2.2.2 23456 11.11.11.5 80 detailed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and your static nat is not correct, it shoudl be:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside)&amp;nbsp; 11.11.11.5 10.10.10.5 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Varun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:39:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-static-nat-for-network-and-host/m-p/1843783#M488735</guid>
      <dc:creator>varrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-12T18:39:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using Static NAT for network and host</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-static-nat-for-network-and-host/m-p/1843784#M488737</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thanks for the help!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:04:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-static-nat-for-network-and-host/m-p/1843784#M488737</guid>
      <dc:creator>ROD FRANKLIN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-12T20:04:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

