<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IPSLA Verification in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ipsla-verification/m-p/1821155#M489770</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not see why this will setup will not work, if both interfaces can get to 9.9.9.9 everything should work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:59:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-29T22:59:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPSLA Verification</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ipsla-verification/m-p/1821154#M489766</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have two internet connections name "outside" and "Voice".&amp;nbsp; The internet connection named "outside" is the main internet conection and the second internet connection "voice" is only used to reach a single IP address (9.9.9.9).&amp;nbsp; I would like it so that if either internet connection fails the connections will failover to the other active internet connection.&amp;nbsp; I going to implement this using IPSLA and would appreciate it if someone could review my config and verify if this will work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [public_ip] 1 track 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route voice 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [public_ip] 254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sla monitor 99&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho [public_ip] interface outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; num-packets 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; frequency 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sla monitor schedule 123 life forever start-time now&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;track 1 rtr 123 reachability&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route voice 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 [public_ip] 1 track 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route outside 9.9.9.9 255.255.255.255 [public_ip] 254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sla monitor 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho [public_ip] interface voice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; num-packets 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; frequency 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sla monitor schedule 100 life forever start-time now&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;track 1 rtr 100 reachability&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:08:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ipsla-verification/m-p/1821154#M489766</guid>
      <dc:creator>networker99</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T22:08:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IPSLA Verification</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ipsla-verification/m-p/1821155#M489770</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not see why this will setup will not work, if both interfaces can get to 9.9.9.9 everything should work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:59:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ipsla-verification/m-p/1821155#M489770</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-29T22:59:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

