<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Interface reconfiguration in a Active/Passive Failover in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-reconfiguration-in-a-active-passive-failover/m-p/1855082#M490384</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is correct, but your network will keep being up and running, so there is no downtime.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem would be when you come back because now that I analize it more, you will not be able to configure Failover as the interfaces are different. so that would be a problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will have a little downtime, so it would be better to get a maintainance window for your network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:50:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-22T05:50:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interface reconfiguration in a Active/Passive Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-reconfiguration-in-a-active-passive-failover/m-p/1855079#M490381</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently l have two ASA 5520's in a active/passive failover scenario.&amp;nbsp; Currently the interfaces for the inside and outside are fixed at 100/FULL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to repatch them into GigE ports setup as Auto Negotiate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there anyway of keeping the connections through the firewall active in this type of scenrio or will l have downtime disconnecting and repatching ?&amp;nbsp; or could l possibly disable failover and reconfigure each ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sg &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:05:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-reconfiguration-in-a-active-passive-failover/m-p/1855079#M490381</guid>
      <dc:creator>sgalloway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T22:05:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interface reconfiguration in a Active/Passive Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-reconfiguration-in-a-active-passive-failover/m-p/1855080#M490382</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If they are on a failover cluster, I would do the changes to one unit first ( the secondary) and as soon as the secondary is up and running again I will set it as the active one and then I will make the same changes for the other unit ( the one that was previously the active one)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That should satisfy your needs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:32:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-reconfiguration-in-a-active-passive-failover/m-p/1855080#M490382</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-22T05:32:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interface reconfiguration in a Active/Passive Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-reconfiguration-in-a-active-passive-failover/m-p/1855081#M490383</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hey Julio,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How would l reconfigure the Secondary if it is in failover ?&amp;nbsp; would l have to disable failover and then reconfigure the interfaces on the secondary to AUTO and then repatch into the gigE port ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:36:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-reconfiguration-in-a-active-passive-failover/m-p/1855081#M490383</guid>
      <dc:creator>sgalloway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-22T05:36:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interface reconfiguration in a Active/Passive Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-reconfiguration-in-a-active-passive-failover/m-p/1855082#M490384</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is correct, but your network will keep being up and running, so there is no downtime.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem would be when you come back because now that I analize it more, you will not be able to configure Failover as the interfaces are different. so that would be a problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will have a little downtime, so it would be better to get a maintainance window for your network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:50:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-reconfiguration-in-a-active-passive-failover/m-p/1855082#M490384</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-22T05:50:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interface reconfiguration in a Active/Passive Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-reconfiguration-in-a-active-passive-failover/m-p/1855083#M490385</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Cheers Julio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will do the following :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;re-patch secondary interfaces into new gigE Ports&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;reconfigure primary interfaces to AUTO and re-patch into gigE Ports..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you have said l will experience a small outage window during the period reconfiguration of the Primary..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your assistance..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-reconfiguration-in-a-active-passive-failover/m-p/1855083#M490385</guid>
      <dc:creator>sgalloway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-22T05:56:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interface reconfiguration in a Active/Passive Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-reconfiguration-in-a-active-passive-failover/m-p/1855084#M490386</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; actually could l do a "no failover"&amp;nbsp; on the primary and then reconfigure the Secondary ASA's interfaces and repatch and then make the secondary the Primary "active" and re-enable failover inturn replicating the config to the old Primary ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-reconfiguration-in-a-active-passive-failover/m-p/1855084#M490386</guid>
      <dc:creator>sgalloway</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-22T06:08:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Interface reconfiguration in a Active/Passive Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-reconfiguration-in-a-active-passive-failover/m-p/1855085#M490387</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is what I though at the beggining, but when you will have on the secondary gigabit ethernet interfaces and on the primary fast ethernet so failover will not work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please rate helpful posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:19:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-reconfiguration-in-a-active-passive-failover/m-p/1855085#M490387</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio Carvajal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-22T06:19:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

