<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX 501 behind router... in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-behind-router/m-p/1038995#M493500</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Firstly - are you allowing ESP thru the router? ity sounds like you are only bringing up phase 1 = IKE which does use UDP 500 &amp;amp; 4500, but you also need to allow protocol 50 thru also.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 07:55:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>andrew.prince</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-09T07:55:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX 501 behind router...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-behind-router/m-p/1038994#M493499</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a PIX 501 that I am setting up at a site that has one static ip address and a router.  I have never setup a PIX 501 without a public address on the WAN so this is new to me.  I have assigned the outside interface of the pix to 192.168.0.254.  On the router I have forwarded UDP 500 and 4500 to the 192.168.0.254 (PIX WAN) address.  The tunnel light comes on on the PIX and when I do a sh crypto isakmp sa I see the tunnel appears to be up in state QM_IDLE.  However, I cannot transmit data across the tunnel or ping.  Any ideas?  Any help would be greatly appeciated.  I have attached the config for review.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-behind-router/m-p/1038994#M493499</guid>
      <dc:creator>ccosper08</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T11:00:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 501 behind router...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-behind-router/m-p/1038995#M493500</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Firstly - are you allowing ESP thru the router? ity sounds like you are only bringing up phase 1 = IKE which does use UDP 500 &amp;amp; 4500, but you also need to allow protocol 50 thru also.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 07:55:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-behind-router/m-p/1038995#M493500</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrew.prince</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-09T07:55:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 501 behind router...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-behind-router/m-p/1038996#M493501</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok I got one tunnel to work fine (192.168.8.0 to 192.168.1.0).  ICMP and data traverse the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tunnel.  However I cannot seem to get the other tunnel working (192.168.5.0 to 192.168.1.0).  If I do a sh crypto ipsec sa on both sides I can see the encapsulated &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;packets getting incremented but the decapsulated stays at 0 on both sides.  I have poured over the configs and cannot see what is wrong.  In my previous post I included the config for the 192.168.1.0 location and I will included the config for the 192.168.5.0 location in this post.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:45:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-behind-router/m-p/1038996#M493501</guid>
      <dc:creator>ccosper08</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-10T13:45:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 501 behind router...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-behind-router/m-p/1038997#M493502</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;what is the ouput from the remote end from:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sh crypto isakmp sa&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sh crypto ispec sa&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:53:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-behind-router/m-p/1038997#M493502</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrew.prince</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-10T13:53:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX 501 behind router...</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-behind-router/m-p/1038998#M493503</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are using same access-list "80" for both NAT 0 ( nat bypass ) and crypto acl.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am wondering how could you create a extended access-list as numbered "80" &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Standard access-list are numbered 1-99 (supports only source address)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First of all change your access-list number to 100 or more and secondly do not use same access-list to do NAT0 and crypto acl.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Create  two separate identical access-lists. For example :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 120 permit ip 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 120 permit ip 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 0 access-list 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map lafayette 10 match address 120&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then post result for following&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;show access-list 100 (check the hitcounts when pkts bypasses )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;show crypto ipsec sa&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Saju&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pls rate if it helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:00:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-501-behind-router/m-p/1038998#M493503</guid>
      <dc:creator>singhsaju</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-10T14:00:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

