<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX Crypto Tunnel Selection in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-crypto-tunnel-selection/m-p/825209#M494493</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If memory servers, I believe the lower map statement has priority. Therefore, everything going from 10.0.0.0 /8 to 10.0.0.0 /8 will be encrypted using the first mymap statement...however, both remote peers and transform sets are the same, so I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-brad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.ccbootcamp.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.ccbootcamp.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(please rate the post if this helps!)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:23:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ccbootcamp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-03T21:23:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX Crypto Tunnel Selection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-crypto-tunnel-selection/m-p/825208#M494492</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm troubleshooting a site-to-site VPN tunnel between our Cat 6506 w/ VPN module to peer's PIX-515.  The peer's crypto config appears to be incorrect and has two tunnels built between it and our VPN module.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map mymap 1 match address acl1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map mymap 1 set peer 1.1.1.1 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map mymap 1 set transform-set myset&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map mymap 2 match address acl2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map mymap 2 set peer 1.1.1.1 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map mymap 2 set transform-set myset&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list acl1 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list acl2 permit ip 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 host 10.255.255.1 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is how does the PIX determine which crypto peer (and subsequent SA) to send a packet to?  In this example if a packet is sent from 10.10.1.1 to 10.255.255.1, does it match acl1 because it is sequentially higher than the next peer, or does it match acl2 because it is the longest-match for that packet?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've tried looking through Cisco's website and documentation, but I cannot find the order of precedence for crypto tunnels and how packets are selected/sent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone here know?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:49:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-crypto-tunnel-selection/m-p/825208#M494492</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbalchunas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T09:49:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Crypto Tunnel Selection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-crypto-tunnel-selection/m-p/825209#M494493</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If memory servers, I believe the lower map statement has priority. Therefore, everything going from 10.0.0.0 /8 to 10.0.0.0 /8 will be encrypted using the first mymap statement...however, both remote peers and transform sets are the same, so I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-brad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.ccbootcamp.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.ccbootcamp.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(please rate the post if this helps!)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:23:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-crypto-tunnel-selection/m-p/825209#M494493</guid>
      <dc:creator>ccbootcamp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-03T21:23:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Crypto Tunnel Selection</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-crypto-tunnel-selection/m-p/825210#M494494</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second crypto map statement should not be configured and is being removed.  That is the first thing we identified on the peer that needed to be changed.  I know that over-lapping networks can cause SPI errors (which is something we are seeing on our end), hence the reason we're troubleshooting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:59:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-crypto-tunnel-selection/m-p/825210#M494494</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbalchunas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-03T21:59:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

