<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Deploy ASA 55xx in transparent - one arm mode? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/deploy-asa-55xx-in-transparent-one-arm-mode/m-p/1743671#M495425</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mohammed,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yey, great news. Thank you for your information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:45:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hiepnguyenho</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-14T01:45:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Deploy ASA 55xx in transparent - one arm mode?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/deploy-asa-55xx-in-transparent-one-arm-mode/m-p/1743667#M495421</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am planning to deploy ASA 5580 in one arm mode for Data Center. The question is, if I use C6509 with FWSM, I can deploy the firewall in transparent &amp;amp; one arm mode with bridge-group on FWSM. But I have 5580 appliance, if I deploy ASA 5580 in transparent mode with 2 sub-interfaces (RED VLAN and GREEN VLAN) assigned to it, can my traffic flow like in below figure?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Data Center, I just want to force some VLANs move through firewall, some bypass, and I dont want to deploy ASA in routed mode. So, please help me to figure it out. Thank you very much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hiep Nguyen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/legacy/7/5/9/64957-Drawing1.vsd.jpg" alt="Drawing1.vsd.jpg" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" height="470" onclick="" style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" width="312" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:39:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/deploy-asa-55xx-in-transparent-one-arm-mode/m-p/1743667#M495421</guid>
      <dc:creator>hiepnguyenho</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T21:39:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deploy ASA 55xx in transparent - one arm mode?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/deploy-asa-55xx-in-transparent-one-arm-mode/m-p/1743668#M495422</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't see any issues with this setup.&amp;nbsp; The 5580 should see the subinterfaces just as it would seperate physical interfaces. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You've probably got a few physical ports on the 5580.&amp;nbsp; You might want to consider setting up lacp to the firewll to get some interface redundancy and additional throughput.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hth,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:50:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/deploy-asa-55xx-in-transparent-one-arm-mode/m-p/1743668#M495422</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick Arps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-18T17:50:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deploy ASA 55xx in transparent - one arm mode?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/deploy-asa-55xx-in-transparent-one-arm-mode/m-p/1743669#M495423</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, thanks a lot Rick. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One better thing of FWSM is in transparent mode, it support bridge-group, that can support 8 pairs of interfaces. For ASA Appliance, it support only 1 pair of interfaces for one-context. So if I have to deploy many server subnets, I have to make ASA context.With 3 default context, I can not scale up my network with this design.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your support.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hiep Nguyen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:52:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/deploy-asa-55xx-in-transparent-one-arm-mode/m-p/1743669#M495423</guid>
      <dc:creator>hiepnguyenho</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-19T02:52:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deploy ASA 55xx in transparent - one arm mode?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/deploy-asa-55xx-in-transparent-one-arm-mode/m-p/1743670#M495424</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Starting with 8.4 you can deploy bridge groups with 4 max interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:11:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/deploy-asa-55xx-in-transparent-one-arm-mode/m-p/1743670#M495424</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed Islam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-11T14:11:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deploy ASA 55xx in transparent - one arm mode?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/deploy-asa-55xx-in-transparent-one-arm-mode/m-p/1743671#M495425</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mohammed,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yey, great news. Thank you for your information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:45:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/deploy-asa-55xx-in-transparent-one-arm-mode/m-p/1743671#M495425</guid>
      <dc:creator>hiepnguyenho</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-14T01:45:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

