<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Static NAT inside to dmz in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-inside-to-dmz/m-p/1737883#M495469</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thank you, Varun.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I thought it probably had something to do with the security level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tony&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:39:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>network16</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-17T15:39:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Static NAT inside to dmz</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-inside-to-dmz/m-p/1737881#M495467</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question about using static NAT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to allow hosts on the inside interface to be able to access hosts in the dmz using their real dmz IP addresses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;inside: 10.0.0.1/21&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;security level 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dmz: 172.31.0.1/21&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;security level 25&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The following command worked:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,dmz) 10.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.248.-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, why didn't this command work?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (dmz,inside) 172.31.0.0 172.31.0.0 netmask 255.255.248.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just curious.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tony&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:38:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-inside-to-dmz/m-p/1737881#M495467</guid>
      <dc:creator>network16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T21:38:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Static NAT inside to dmz</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-inside-to-dmz/m-p/1737882#M495468</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Tony,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Going from Higher security interface to lower security interface, you essentially need a source nat, therefore first one is needed, if you do not have nat-control enabled, then you woudl just need the first statements and not second.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Varun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:19:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-inside-to-dmz/m-p/1737882#M495468</guid>
      <dc:creator>varrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-17T15:19:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Static NAT inside to dmz</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-inside-to-dmz/m-p/1737883#M495469</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thank you, Varun.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I thought it probably had something to do with the security level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tony&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:39:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-inside-to-dmz/m-p/1737883#M495469</guid>
      <dc:creator>network16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-17T15:39:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Static NAT inside to dmz</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-inside-to-dmz/m-p/1737884#M495470</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No issues, let me know if you have any other concerns.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Varun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:50:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-inside-to-dmz/m-p/1737884#M495470</guid>
      <dc:creator>varrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-17T16:50:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

