<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Switch between Cisco ASA for failover in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switch-between-cisco-asa-for-failover/m-p/1767853#M495919</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thanks Jon! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:16:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>network_user</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-12T19:16:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Switch between Cisco ASA for failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switch-between-cisco-asa-for-failover/m-p/1767851#M495917</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see Cisco recommends that you should connect a dedicated switch between two ASAs for configuring LAN failover and stateful failover, instead of connecting a cable directly between the two ASAs. Does someone know what is the advantage of putting a switch in between them??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:36:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switch-between-cisco-asa-for-failover/m-p/1767851#M495917</guid>
      <dc:creator>network_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T21:36:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Switch between Cisco ASA for failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switch-between-cisco-asa-for-failover/m-p/1767852#M495918</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The main advantage is that if you use a direct cable and one of the failover interfaces fails then the other interface on the other firewall goes down as well so it can make troubleshooting difficult. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you use a switch and one interface fails the other is still up because it is connected to the switch. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It does not necessarily have to be a dedicated switch in terms of only using that switch for the failover link, as long as the switch you use is not overutilised and is not heavily oversubscribed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:49:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switch-between-cisco-asa-for-failover/m-p/1767852#M495918</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-11T17:49:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Switch between Cisco ASA for failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switch-between-cisco-asa-for-failover/m-p/1767853#M495919</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thanks Jon! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:16:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/switch-between-cisco-asa-for-failover/m-p/1767853#M495919</guid>
      <dc:creator>network_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-12T19:16:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

