topic Redaundancy on Pix in Network Security https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/redaundancy-on-pix/m-p/722499#M496015 <P>Hi Experts,</P><P></P><P>We have 2 ISP's consider SP-A and SP-B. Both are connected to Router. We have default routes on Router to SP-A and SP-B. Router is connected to PIX. Patting has been performed for both the ISP's. Now I need some redundancy on PIX so that SP-A fails SP-B takes over or vice versa. I cant use two PIX. Please let me know the solution.</P><P></P><P>Cheers,</P><P>Nik</P> Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:27:30 GMT nikhil.engineer 2020-02-21T09:27:30Z Redaundancy on Pix https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/redaundancy-on-pix/m-p/722499#M496015 <P>Hi Experts,</P><P></P><P>We have 2 ISP's consider SP-A and SP-B. Both are connected to Router. We have default routes on Router to SP-A and SP-B. Router is connected to PIX. Patting has been performed for both the ISP's. Now I need some redundancy on PIX so that SP-A fails SP-B takes over or vice versa. I cant use two PIX. Please let me know the solution.</P><P></P><P>Cheers,</P><P>Nik</P> Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:27:30 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/redaundancy-on-pix/m-p/722499#M496015 nikhil.engineer 2020-02-21T09:27:30Z Re: Redaundancy on Pix https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/redaundancy-on-pix/m-p/722500#M496016 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Lan----&gt;Pix------&gt;ROuter---ISPA</P><P> |</P><P> |</P><P> ISP B</P><P></P><P>The default route on FW would be pointing to Router....why do you need redundancy on FW if your Router is doing load balancing (both ISP terminating of Router) </P><P></P><P>Whether your ISP A fails or ISP B fails FW woudl still be pointing the traffic to router.. so your ROuter has to do the ISP falback mechanism</P></BODY></HTML> Sat, 24 Mar 2007 00:08:08 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/redaundancy-on-pix/m-p/722500#M496016 abinjola 2007-03-24T00:08:08Z