<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Do the static command needed? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/do-the-static-command-needed/m-p/1803803#M496515</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; If natting is not required between inside network and outside, you can probably remove all the static identity nat but check with the customer&amp;nbsp; why he has done all these identity nat because if there are any other static/policy nat it could affect the network traffic removing these.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 09:54:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Moorthy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-05T09:54:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Do the static command needed?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/do-the-static-command-needed/m-p/1803802#M496514</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The firewall is running version &lt;A&gt;&lt;/A&gt;8.2 on ASA 5580. Address translation is not needed on Inside network and Outside network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the customer has hundreds of static command as below..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 10.10.10.0 10.10.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 10.10.11.0 10.10.11.0 netmask 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 10.10.12.0 10.10.12.0 netmask 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 10.10.13.0 10.10.13.0 netmask 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can they all be removed and replace with one single command as below?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no nat-control&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(i think no nat-control is default setting anyway).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/do-the-static-command-needed/m-p/1803802#M496514</guid>
      <dc:creator>kope</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T21:33:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do the static command needed?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/do-the-static-command-needed/m-p/1803803#M496515</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; If natting is not required between inside network and outside, you can probably remove all the static identity nat but check with the customer&amp;nbsp; why he has done all these identity nat because if there are any other static/policy nat it could affect the network traffic removing these.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 09:54:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/do-the-static-command-needed/m-p/1803803#M496515</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexander Moorthy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-05T09:54:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

