<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Pix OSPF load balancing question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-ospf-load-balancing-question/m-p/623942#M497066</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The pix does not do load balancing.  Your only option would be to configure the upstream routers to load balance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cpembleton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-10-20T12:45:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pix OSPF load balancing question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-ospf-load-balancing-question/m-p/623941#M497064</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a pix 515e with two default routes, learned via OSPF from two routers on the "outside" interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently router#2 is being preferred way much more than router#1. There are many thousands of destinations for the traffic. These two routers are further doing NAT to nat rfc1918 ip's to the internet (the pix is NOT doing nat)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone please let me know how the PIX does load balancing? is it by IP address destination? is it something else?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joe&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:14:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-ospf-load-balancing-question/m-p/623941#M497064</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbrunner007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T09:14:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix OSPF load balancing question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-ospf-load-balancing-question/m-p/623942#M497066</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The pix does not do load balancing.  Your only option would be to configure the upstream routers to load balance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-ospf-load-balancing-question/m-p/623942#M497066</guid>
      <dc:creator>cpembleton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-20T12:45:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix OSPF load balancing question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-ospf-load-balancing-question/m-p/623943#M497067</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Per TAC:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"the PIX will do per-destination Load Balancing instead of per packet&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;load balancing. The algorithm will look at the source and destination&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;addresses. It does not do 1:1 load balancing. Given enough different&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;source and destination addresses, the packets will more or less reach a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;50/50 spit between the two next-hops. However, in real world testing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with the same source and destination addresses, it may not reach an even&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;load balancing."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 02:55:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-ospf-load-balancing-question/m-p/623943#M497067</guid>
      <dc:creator>mlitka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-22T02:55:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

