topic Re: PIX 525 NAT in Network Security https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-525-nat/m-p/596573#M498409 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>It's actually pretty common. What you need to do is explore the policy nat features introduced in PIX OS 6.2. </P><P></P><P><A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080172786.html#wp1113601" target="_blank">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080172786.html#wp1113601</A></P><P></P><P>HTH Pls Rate!</P></BODY></HTML> Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:13:02 GMT mmorris11 2006-08-14T17:13:02Z PIX 525 NAT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-525-nat/m-p/596572#M498408 <P>I have a weird situation that I could use some help with.</P><P></P><P>I have a customer that is using an RFC 1918 range internally. One the remote end of an IPSEC VPN a vendor is using in part some of the same block. I need to be able to NAT two system to new address for bi-directional communication. I also need to be able to let those two original system to be able to access the internet as needed being globally translated to the address already in that pool/interface on the original customer PIX.</P> Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:06:42 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-525-nat/m-p/596572#M498408 enforcers 2020-02-21T09:06:42Z Re: PIX 525 NAT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-525-nat/m-p/596573#M498409 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>It's actually pretty common. What you need to do is explore the policy nat features introduced in PIX OS 6.2. </P><P></P><P><A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080172786.html#wp1113601" target="_blank">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080172786.html#wp1113601</A></P><P></P><P>HTH Pls Rate!</P></BODY></HTML> Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:13:02 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-525-nat/m-p/596573#M498409 mmorris11 2006-08-14T17:13:02Z