<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Large Ping Packets Dropped (PIX) in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/large-ping-packets-dropped-pix/m-p/580624#M498513</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for you reply, it apears to be doing the same issue even routing through a layer 3 switch instead.  Not to worry, bigger issues now &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:45:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>murphyw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-08-15T14:45:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Large Ping Packets Dropped (PIX)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/large-ping-packets-dropped-pix/m-p/580622#M498509</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  I am hoping someone can point me in the right direction here.  I have just plugged in a Pix 535 (with an allow ip any any access list on all interfaces) into the core of our network.  I have also configured it to not do any NAT's and purely route (same-security-traffic permit inter-interface &amp;amp; no nat control).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have noticed that now the new firewall is in place, i cannot ping through the firewall with packets larger then 1473bytes.  I am just wondering if this is normal behaviour and/or could it cause any performance issues ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(i have just noticed if i do a ping to x.y.z.254 [router] with 1500bytes, it works ok.  If i do x.y.z.200 [client] it only works to 1472bytes then starts failing)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks very much in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:06:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/large-ping-packets-dropped-pix/m-p/580622#M498509</guid>
      <dc:creator>murphyw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T09:06:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Large Ping Packets Dropped (PIX)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/large-ping-packets-dropped-pix/m-p/580623#M498512</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure this is the same thing, but the IDS functionality of the PIX IOS drops packet above a certain size due to security concerns.  I could not pass packets about 993bytes or something like that on PIX 506E's running 6.3.4 until I disable a couple of the ip attacke audit blah blah blah lines.  Just a thought.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eric Watters&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Atlanta, Ga.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:03:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/large-ping-packets-dropped-pix/m-p/580623#M498512</guid>
      <dc:creator>eh2os</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-10T14:03:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Large Ping Packets Dropped (PIX)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/large-ping-packets-dropped-pix/m-p/580624#M498513</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for you reply, it apears to be doing the same issue even routing through a layer 3 switch instead.  Not to worry, bigger issues now &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:45:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/large-ping-packets-dropped-pix/m-p/580624#M498513</guid>
      <dc:creator>murphyw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-15T14:45:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

